Barack Hussein Obama II has been proven by all pre-existing legal criteria and precedent to be ineligible to run for the Office of Presidency of the USA; Obama since illegally in this office has acted in every major decision against the interests of the USA; every sitting congressman, senator, court justice, CIA, FBI are fully aware that Obama is an ineligible, unqualified, even traitorous impostor.
Why is Obama not only still in office but will win certain re-election in November 2012?
That puzzling question can be answered by another puzzling question.
Why has there been no further terrorist attacks on the US mainland since September 11, 2001?
One very plausible explanation is that the United States government has been coerced into a undisclosed treaty with the militant Muslims to allow a Muslim to be elected the President of the USA in exchange for a full moratorium on any further terrorist attacks on America. Attacks upon the major cities, airports, national monuments, the Golden State Bridge, the Statue of Liberty and the White House itself which would cause untold civilian deaths and complete breakdown of American society.
This would explain the apparent cowardice of responsible members of government, of the press and of the media to almost frantically deny or ridicule any surfacing of the true facts about Obama and his parentage and education. They were not silent to protect their careers, they were terrified into silence to protect their lives.
This siege now being waged against America and American interests abroad has succeeded beyond any other take over of one nation by its sworn enemies. This enemy is Islamic. Its current leader is Iran. Its financial backer is Saudi Arabia. It now has its own trained and sponsored Muslim leader in Barack Hussein Obama II, the President of the USA ....... for life. Obama is a devious plant to slowly but surely prepare the American mind and will to Islamic laws and barbaric customs. Obama cannot be impeached, accused or removed from office without the risks of America being destroyed by Iranian sleeper terrorists already within its borders.
And this Islamic threat is far removed from, perhaps totally unaware of, the existing movement to obliterate not only Western values and religions but all religions on earth.
Friday, February 17, 2012
Thursday, February 16, 2012
The 1917 Houston Rioting
In Spring 1917, the US War Department ordered two US Army military installations to be built in Harris County, Texas. These were Camp Logan and Ellington Field. The bases were initially to house and train soldiers from the Illinois National Guard and were very close to Houston.
On July 27, 1917 the all-Negro 3rd Battalion, 24th Infantry Regiment traveled by train to Houston from Camp Columbus, New Mexico accompanied by 7 White officers. The 24th had previously been stationed in the Philippines. There was extreme racial segregation in Texas and the wearing of an US Army uniform meant absolutely nothing different in being treated as a Negro. One Negro soldier was shot and killed for just wearing that army uniform. Both military and civilian coloureds were referred to as "niggers".
About noontime on August 23, 1917, in Houston's Fourth Ward, the Houston Police while searching for someone else were required to further take into custody an uncooperative Negress in the home. This woman was intoxicated and physically resisted the police until finally the arrest had to be made outside on the street.
A Negro soldier from the 24th interfered and was immediately beaten to the ground, arrested and jailed.
That afternoon of August 23rd, a Negro military police corporal, Charles Baltimore, went to the Houston Police Station to investigate the incident of earlier that day but to also to try to release another soldier who was in jail for an entirely separate charge. Soon heated arguments turned to violence resulting in Corporal Baltimore being beaten and arrested himself. However, Baltimore was soon released.
In the dark, rainy evening of August 23rd, 156 Negro soldiers disobeyed officers' orders, stole weapons from the camp depot and marched on the city of Houston. It appears that the main instigator was a Negro sergeant, Vida Henry, of I Company. These rioters were met outside of Houston by the Houston Police and a large force of armed civilians. A virtual race riot ensued in which 4 Negro soldiers, 4 Houston Police and 12 citizens were killed. Also killed was a Captain Joseph Mattes of the Illinois National Guard. The instigator, Sgt Henry, shot and killed himself.
On August 24, 1917 order was restored around Houston, all Negro soldiers disarmed and the 3rd Battalion sent by rail back to New Mexico
The deaths of so many civilians and the long held fear of arming Negro military resulted in not one but three court martials to finally satisfy the US military.
Present at the first court martial were 3 Brigadier Generals, 7 full Colonels, 3 Lt Colonels. Of the officers eight were graduates of West Point. On December 6, 1917, 13 Negro soldiers including Corporal Baltimore were sentenced to be hanged for murder, 41 Negros were given life sentences.
On December 11 1917, on over-night built gallows, the 13 accused murderers were hanged simultaneously at 07:17 AM. Only Army and county personnel were allowed to witness the executions.
The second court martial (known as the Washington case) took place 6 days later in which 15 Negroes of the lower A Division were tried. Five given the death sentence.
At the third court martial (known as the Tillman case) on March 26 1918, 40 more Negro soldiers were charged; 11 sentenced to death; the others to life imprisonment.
On May 2 1918, General John Ruckman formally approved and sanctioned all sentences.
On July 27, 1917 the all-Negro 3rd Battalion, 24th Infantry Regiment traveled by train to Houston from Camp Columbus, New Mexico accompanied by 7 White officers. The 24th had previously been stationed in the Philippines. There was extreme racial segregation in Texas and the wearing of an US Army uniform meant absolutely nothing different in being treated as a Negro. One Negro soldier was shot and killed for just wearing that army uniform. Both military and civilian coloureds were referred to as "niggers".
About noontime on August 23, 1917, in Houston's Fourth Ward, the Houston Police while searching for someone else were required to further take into custody an uncooperative Negress in the home. This woman was intoxicated and physically resisted the police until finally the arrest had to be made outside on the street.
A Negro soldier from the 24th interfered and was immediately beaten to the ground, arrested and jailed.
That afternoon of August 23rd, a Negro military police corporal, Charles Baltimore, went to the Houston Police Station to investigate the incident of earlier that day but to also to try to release another soldier who was in jail for an entirely separate charge. Soon heated arguments turned to violence resulting in Corporal Baltimore being beaten and arrested himself. However, Baltimore was soon released.
In the dark, rainy evening of August 23rd, 156 Negro soldiers disobeyed officers' orders, stole weapons from the camp depot and marched on the city of Houston. It appears that the main instigator was a Negro sergeant, Vida Henry, of I Company. These rioters were met outside of Houston by the Houston Police and a large force of armed civilians. A virtual race riot ensued in which 4 Negro soldiers, 4 Houston Police and 12 citizens were killed. Also killed was a Captain Joseph Mattes of the Illinois National Guard. The instigator, Sgt Henry, shot and killed himself.
On August 24, 1917 order was restored around Houston, all Negro soldiers disarmed and the 3rd Battalion sent by rail back to New Mexico
The deaths of so many civilians and the long held fear of arming Negro military resulted in not one but three court martials to finally satisfy the US military.
Present at the first court martial were 3 Brigadier Generals, 7 full Colonels, 3 Lt Colonels. Of the officers eight were graduates of West Point. On December 6, 1917, 13 Negro soldiers including Corporal Baltimore were sentenced to be hanged for murder, 41 Negros were given life sentences.
On December 11 1917, on over-night built gallows, the 13 accused murderers were hanged simultaneously at 07:17 AM. Only Army and county personnel were allowed to witness the executions.
The second court martial (known as the Washington case) took place 6 days later in which 15 Negroes of the lower A Division were tried. Five given the death sentence.
At the third court martial (known as the Tillman case) on March 26 1918, 40 more Negro soldiers were charged; 11 sentenced to death; the others to life imprisonment.
On May 2 1918, General John Ruckman formally approved and sanctioned all sentences.
Sunday, February 12, 2012
Cut to the Core
To those who chide about my persistence in discussing the Negro race dilemma in America today in 2012, after a half century of so-called "settled" opinions contrary to my views, I stubbornly answer, "no sound and permanent solution to any problem was ever finally found without going to the original core of it.". False conclusions stacked upon years of other false conclusions prove nothing toward the validity or soundness of the original problem. A train mistakenly switched onto one track will remain on that course until it is somehow reversed or shunted to the correct track no matter how much time elapsed or how sure the engineer thought he was proceeding correctly.
The heart and core of the major problem with race in America lies in establishing the valid answer to one debated question of anthropology. Are the proven limitations of the Negro the sole result of his bad environment or is his proven bad environment the result of his innate limitations? Can any and every effort to change or improve the Negro's surroundings and education ever reach the root cause of his comparatively inferior performance OR is such inferior performance strictly a matter of innate racial differences?
From 1930 on, every public decision or policy concerning the Negro race should have been decided on the proper answer to the question above: innate racial differences. Consider and consider very objectively the bottomless predicament this nation faced yesterday, faces today and will face tomorrow because we were duped on to the wrong track, we allowed every public program, related law and an obscene political correctness to be enacted under the erroneous hypothesis of "the environment". And to repeat, in spite of all the then existing evidence proving that hypothesis to be WRONG.
What is more important and vital is informing Americans that they are marching off a cliff because of an environmental hypothesis of pure ILLUSION and to STOP, REFLECT, then commence to form racial policies based upon REALITY. As controversial and counter the status-quo as it will be, there is no other way to a permanent solution to the racial divide. Otherwise, very bluntly the White American culture and way of life will be destroyed by hordes of violent, anti-white, savages identical in innate behavior as in South Africa, Rhodesia, Kenya, Uganda in fact in all of the imposition of "Africa for the Africans".
When I was an outside investigator and collector for credit companies and even if the city was unfamiliar to me, when given the general location I would find the Negro neighborhoods by merely approaching them. I would know that 99% of the day's calls were going to be on the streets right there. This was not the case with the rare calls I was assigned in other poor sections of the city because these were White neighborhoods with somewhat of a pride in their appearance. In a large city or small town, the Negro neighborhoods were the same - trash-strewn, broken glass, empty buildings and guys hanging around. One city project built with much fanfare for poor Negroes was Elmhaven in New Haven CT. A year later it was an utterly vandalized and destroyed building complex. Even the heavy cement seats bolted down for outside sitting were gone.
The mail boxes in the entry were smashed, doors ripped off and spray-painted all over the names.
The elevator was designed to only stop at even numbered floors so if one wanted to go to floor 5, he would go to floor 6 and walk down the stairwell to floor 5. Whenever I was forced to enter the closed stairwell, I would brace myself, take a deep breath, then bolt down the stairs as fast as I could. The stench of orange peels mixed with garbage and who knows what in that stairwell could sicken a hog. At the bottom of the stairs were piles of garbage, debris and anything that could be indifferently thrown down there. Remember people still lived there, this was their home. This was the way Negroes lived. And I suspect that those types of government provided and subsidized housing developments are the same today or worse.
My experiences were in 1953, the crucial debate over Negro rights was going on. Did any liberal, equalitarian, pompous proponent of forced mixing of White and Negroes ever dare to witness the thousand examples like Elmhaven in New Haven alone? Have any useful idiots of that insane era ever admitted their errors?
"Repetition does not transform a lie into a truth." - Franklin Delano Roosevelt
The heart and core of the major problem with race in America lies in establishing the valid answer to one debated question of anthropology. Are the proven limitations of the Negro the sole result of his bad environment or is his proven bad environment the result of his innate limitations? Can any and every effort to change or improve the Negro's surroundings and education ever reach the root cause of his comparatively inferior performance OR is such inferior performance strictly a matter of innate racial differences?
From 1930 on, every public decision or policy concerning the Negro race should have been decided on the proper answer to the question above: innate racial differences. Consider and consider very objectively the bottomless predicament this nation faced yesterday, faces today and will face tomorrow because we were duped on to the wrong track, we allowed every public program, related law and an obscene political correctness to be enacted under the erroneous hypothesis of "the environment". And to repeat, in spite of all the then existing evidence proving that hypothesis to be WRONG.
What is more important and vital is informing Americans that they are marching off a cliff because of an environmental hypothesis of pure ILLUSION and to STOP, REFLECT, then commence to form racial policies based upon REALITY. As controversial and counter the status-quo as it will be, there is no other way to a permanent solution to the racial divide. Otherwise, very bluntly the White American culture and way of life will be destroyed by hordes of violent, anti-white, savages identical in innate behavior as in South Africa, Rhodesia, Kenya, Uganda in fact in all of the imposition of "Africa for the Africans".
When I was an outside investigator and collector for credit companies and even if the city was unfamiliar to me, when given the general location I would find the Negro neighborhoods by merely approaching them. I would know that 99% of the day's calls were going to be on the streets right there. This was not the case with the rare calls I was assigned in other poor sections of the city because these were White neighborhoods with somewhat of a pride in their appearance. In a large city or small town, the Negro neighborhoods were the same - trash-strewn, broken glass, empty buildings and guys hanging around. One city project built with much fanfare for poor Negroes was Elmhaven in New Haven CT. A year later it was an utterly vandalized and destroyed building complex. Even the heavy cement seats bolted down for outside sitting were gone.
The mail boxes in the entry were smashed, doors ripped off and spray-painted all over the names.
The elevator was designed to only stop at even numbered floors so if one wanted to go to floor 5, he would go to floor 6 and walk down the stairwell to floor 5. Whenever I was forced to enter the closed stairwell, I would brace myself, take a deep breath, then bolt down the stairs as fast as I could. The stench of orange peels mixed with garbage and who knows what in that stairwell could sicken a hog. At the bottom of the stairs were piles of garbage, debris and anything that could be indifferently thrown down there. Remember people still lived there, this was their home. This was the way Negroes lived. And I suspect that those types of government provided and subsidized housing developments are the same today or worse.
My experiences were in 1953, the crucial debate over Negro rights was going on. Did any liberal, equalitarian, pompous proponent of forced mixing of White and Negroes ever dare to witness the thousand examples like Elmhaven in New Haven alone? Have any useful idiots of that insane era ever admitted their errors?
"Repetition does not transform a lie into a truth." - Franklin Delano Roosevelt
Saturday, February 11, 2012
Incidents of Insurrection
During World War II, Townsville, Queensland, Australia was a crucial base for American and Australian campaigns in the Pacific, including the Battle of the Coral Sea. It remains an Australian military base today.
Though never reported to or by the American press, in May 1942 Townsville was also the site of one of the biggest troop uprising within the US military. The shootings and rioting were by American Negro soldiers.
And it was not the first or last such racial and armed conflict in Australia.
In April 1942 a large contingent of American Negro troops arrived in Townsville. These Negroes had been trained very minimally in military discipline or behavior. They were basically American laborers brought in to help build airfields around Townsville. As per strict US military order, all officers were White, although there were Negro non-commissioned officers. Negro troops were very rarely committed to actual combat. These soldiers were from the 96th Battalion, US Army Corps of Engineers and were stationed at a base on the western outskirts of Townsville. This base was known as "Kelso".
Shortly after arrival, 100 Negro troops created a racial conflict near their base and had to be rounded up by the US Marines using bayonets and loaded rifles.
In May 1942, racial tensions between the White officers and Negro troops escalated to the point where several Negro ringleaders decided to machine gun the tents of the White officers. Thousands of rounds were fired, the White officers returned fire and estimates up to 19 personnel were killed and dozens more seriously wounded. Negro soldiers rampaged from the camp, terrorizing surrounding Australian homes and at least one rape was reported. The overall siege lasted over 8 hours.
Fully armed Australian troops along with the Queensland Police and the Townsville Police were called in to roadblock the rioters from entering the city. The official accounts of these incidents are still in police archives.
The violence was subdued and many of the Negro rioters packed off to New Guinea.
Though kept completely secret by the Roosevelt administration, the whole affair was severe enough that in 1942, US Congressman Lyndon B. Johnson went to Australia and spent 3 days in Townsville. Johnson was given and examined official US and Australian military accounts of the Negro rioting and also the eyewitness report of a US journalist who was stationed at Kelso. But despite this, the rebellion was never reported by the US press but instead filed away in the national archives. President Roosevelt did not want any details of this racial incident to ever come out and, in fact, in 1943 Eleanor Roosevelt herself was dispatched to visit a newly established "Negro Only" service club in Townsville.
There were about 10,000 American Negro servicemen sent to Australia during the war. Australia had a very strict racial segregation. In 1942 there were also other clashes involving Negro GIs at Torrens Creek, Ingham, and Mt Isa, in Australia.
Later in 1944 in another part of the Pacific there was one of the most serious racial incident between Negro navy personnel and US Marines.
In July 1944 the 3rd Marine Division retook Guam from the Japanese at the cost of 1,600 Marine lives. Guam was turned into a base for allied operations. Five large airfields were constructed by the SeaBeas. B-29 super bombers could fly as far a mainland Japan.
In late August 1944, just a few weeks after already battle worn Marines had been exposed to the most vicious fighting and hand-to-hand combat with Japanese defenders, the all Negro 25th Depot Company of the US Navy started landing operations at the Naval Supply Depot. There sparked immediate tensions and minor incidents between the White Marines and the Negro naval personnel.
On Christmas Eve 1944, nine Negro Marines from the 25th Depot Company were on pass and went into Agana. There was a confrontation between the Negroes and White Marines, supposedly shots were fired at the Negroes who were forced to flee back to the base. Eight were OK, one Negro Marine was missing.
In re-action, 40 Negro enlisted men piled into two trucks and started off toward Agana to find the missing man. However the MPs in Agana were informed and the MPs proceeded to erect barricades across all roads leading into Agana. The two trucks were stopped, there was a brief standoff but when the Negroes were told that the missing man had been found and was OK, they returned to their base.
On Christmas Day 1944, a Negro enlisted man walking back to camp from Agana was shot dead by two White Marines. Shortly thereafter another Negro enlisted man was shot and killed in Agana.
On December 26 1944, a vehicle driven by White Marines opened gunfire on the Negro depot. Camp guards returned fire and a White officer was wounded. The vehicle fled toward Agana; behind them a number of armed Negro personnel. All vehicles were stopped by White MPs at a roadblock outside of Agana. All participants White or Negro were arrested and charged with attempted murder, rioting, unlawful assembly, and theft of government property.
At the Court of Inquiry, 45 Negro military personnel were court martialed and sent to prison.
Though never reported to or by the American press, in May 1942 Townsville was also the site of one of the biggest troop uprising within the US military. The shootings and rioting were by American Negro soldiers.
And it was not the first or last such racial and armed conflict in Australia.
In April 1942 a large contingent of American Negro troops arrived in Townsville. These Negroes had been trained very minimally in military discipline or behavior. They were basically American laborers brought in to help build airfields around Townsville. As per strict US military order, all officers were White, although there were Negro non-commissioned officers. Negro troops were very rarely committed to actual combat. These soldiers were from the 96th Battalion, US Army Corps of Engineers and were stationed at a base on the western outskirts of Townsville. This base was known as "Kelso".
Shortly after arrival, 100 Negro troops created a racial conflict near their base and had to be rounded up by the US Marines using bayonets and loaded rifles.
In May 1942, racial tensions between the White officers and Negro troops escalated to the point where several Negro ringleaders decided to machine gun the tents of the White officers. Thousands of rounds were fired, the White officers returned fire and estimates up to 19 personnel were killed and dozens more seriously wounded. Negro soldiers rampaged from the camp, terrorizing surrounding Australian homes and at least one rape was reported. The overall siege lasted over 8 hours.
Fully armed Australian troops along with the Queensland Police and the Townsville Police were called in to roadblock the rioters from entering the city. The official accounts of these incidents are still in police archives.
The violence was subdued and many of the Negro rioters packed off to New Guinea.
Though kept completely secret by the Roosevelt administration, the whole affair was severe enough that in 1942, US Congressman Lyndon B. Johnson went to Australia and spent 3 days in Townsville. Johnson was given and examined official US and Australian military accounts of the Negro rioting and also the eyewitness report of a US journalist who was stationed at Kelso. But despite this, the rebellion was never reported by the US press but instead filed away in the national archives. President Roosevelt did not want any details of this racial incident to ever come out and, in fact, in 1943 Eleanor Roosevelt herself was dispatched to visit a newly established "Negro Only" service club in Townsville.
There were about 10,000 American Negro servicemen sent to Australia during the war. Australia had a very strict racial segregation. In 1942 there were also other clashes involving Negro GIs at Torrens Creek, Ingham, and Mt Isa, in Australia.
Later in 1944 in another part of the Pacific there was one of the most serious racial incident between Negro navy personnel and US Marines.
In July 1944 the 3rd Marine Division retook Guam from the Japanese at the cost of 1,600 Marine lives. Guam was turned into a base for allied operations. Five large airfields were constructed by the SeaBeas. B-29 super bombers could fly as far a mainland Japan.
In late August 1944, just a few weeks after already battle worn Marines had been exposed to the most vicious fighting and hand-to-hand combat with Japanese defenders, the all Negro 25th Depot Company of the US Navy started landing operations at the Naval Supply Depot. There sparked immediate tensions and minor incidents between the White Marines and the Negro naval personnel.
On Christmas Eve 1944, nine Negro Marines from the 25th Depot Company were on pass and went into Agana. There was a confrontation between the Negroes and White Marines, supposedly shots were fired at the Negroes who were forced to flee back to the base. Eight were OK, one Negro Marine was missing.
In re-action, 40 Negro enlisted men piled into two trucks and started off toward Agana to find the missing man. However the MPs in Agana were informed and the MPs proceeded to erect barricades across all roads leading into Agana. The two trucks were stopped, there was a brief standoff but when the Negroes were told that the missing man had been found and was OK, they returned to their base.
On Christmas Day 1944, a Negro enlisted man walking back to camp from Agana was shot dead by two White Marines. Shortly thereafter another Negro enlisted man was shot and killed in Agana.
On December 26 1944, a vehicle driven by White Marines opened gunfire on the Negro depot. Camp guards returned fire and a White officer was wounded. The vehicle fled toward Agana; behind them a number of armed Negro personnel. All vehicles were stopped by White MPs at a roadblock outside of Agana. All participants White or Negro were arrested and charged with attempted murder, rioting, unlawful assembly, and theft of government property.
At the Court of Inquiry, 45 Negro military personnel were court martialed and sent to prison.
Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Remember Rhodesia
Is the past our future? The lesson of Southern Rhodesia.
In 1980, a flourishing, stable, free, democratic republic was murdered and hung out to decay by Great Britain, the United States and the West in the equalitarian name of "anti-racism" and "African-democracy". This civilization was once the proud British colony of Rhodesia.
On November 11, 1965 Southern Rhodesia, which had experienced the highest casualty count of any of the British colonies in World War II, faced with the terrifying prospect of Negro majority rule, unilaterally declared independence from the British Empire. The Rhodesians were determined to avoid the disaster of a "one man, one vote" Negro majority rule.
Rhodesia had been denied independence because of the politically correct "NIMBAR policy" of Great Britain. This unjust policy was enforced by Prime Minister, Harold Wilson, and utterly discounted the proven success or stability of a colony and instead evaluated its commitment to universal manhood sufferage. NIMBAR stood for "No Independence Before African Rule".
After self-declared independence, Rhodesia faced endless economic sanctions imposed by the United Nations in the utopian aim to topple the new government of Ian Smith. Ian Smith had been an ace pilot for the Royal Air Force in World War II and was the duly elected leader of the Rhodesians. No foreign government, including the United States, recognized the new Rhodesia or welcomed it into the family of free republics.
But Rhodesia was not defeated. It carried on honorably and successfully until about 1975 when South Africa withdrew its support and Marxist (Negro) terrorists renewed guerrilla war against Rhodesia. When Angola and Mozambique fell to Marxist majority rule, the United States under Secretary of State Henry Kissinger increased its pressure on Rhodesia to accept majority Negro rule.
In 1980, the freed, Marxist terrorist prisoner, Robert Mugabe, became the President of the Republic of Zimbabwe, once Rhodesia, through African-style "democratic" elections. Under Mugabe's tyrannical and erratic rule Zimbabwe became a culture being murdered one White farm family at a time. The murder weapon being the West's own suicidal, liberal ideology applied to a totally unsuitable Negro racial context.
The lesson from the world's treatment of Rhodesia is this:
Political inclusion of Negroes in a liberal democracy inevitably transforms a society from a promised multi-racial utopia into a barbaric democracy; rule by the long knife. This is now demonstrated in Zimbabwe, a nation in poverty, where Negroes are 98.5 percent of the population.
In 1980, a flourishing, stable, free, democratic republic was murdered and hung out to decay by Great Britain, the United States and the West in the equalitarian name of "anti-racism" and "African-democracy". This civilization was once the proud British colony of Rhodesia.
On November 11, 1965 Southern Rhodesia, which had experienced the highest casualty count of any of the British colonies in World War II, faced with the terrifying prospect of Negro majority rule, unilaterally declared independence from the British Empire. The Rhodesians were determined to avoid the disaster of a "one man, one vote" Negro majority rule.
Rhodesia had been denied independence because of the politically correct "NIMBAR policy" of Great Britain. This unjust policy was enforced by Prime Minister, Harold Wilson, and utterly discounted the proven success or stability of a colony and instead evaluated its commitment to universal manhood sufferage. NIMBAR stood for "No Independence Before African Rule".
After self-declared independence, Rhodesia faced endless economic sanctions imposed by the United Nations in the utopian aim to topple the new government of Ian Smith. Ian Smith had been an ace pilot for the Royal Air Force in World War II and was the duly elected leader of the Rhodesians. No foreign government, including the United States, recognized the new Rhodesia or welcomed it into the family of free republics.
But Rhodesia was not defeated. It carried on honorably and successfully until about 1975 when South Africa withdrew its support and Marxist (Negro) terrorists renewed guerrilla war against Rhodesia. When Angola and Mozambique fell to Marxist majority rule, the United States under Secretary of State Henry Kissinger increased its pressure on Rhodesia to accept majority Negro rule.
In 1980, the freed, Marxist terrorist prisoner, Robert Mugabe, became the President of the Republic of Zimbabwe, once Rhodesia, through African-style "democratic" elections. Under Mugabe's tyrannical and erratic rule Zimbabwe became a culture being murdered one White farm family at a time. The murder weapon being the West's own suicidal, liberal ideology applied to a totally unsuitable Negro racial context.
The lesson from the world's treatment of Rhodesia is this:
Political inclusion of Negroes in a liberal democracy inevitably transforms a society from a promised multi-racial utopia into a barbaric democracy; rule by the long knife. This is now demonstrated in Zimbabwe, a nation in poverty, where Negroes are 98.5 percent of the population.
Leftists Shalt Not Covet
A serious flaw in even the most intelligent critics of equalitarianism/socialism/communism is accepting that the more hard-core a progressive is, the deeper is his comprehension and conviction as to the equalitarian agendas. And that this pureness of motivation differs the hard- core socialist from the brain-washed or opportunist fringe adherents, paternally referred to by N. Lenin as the "useful idiots".
Simply, and less dramatically put, it is far more likely that the driving motivation behind the hard-core leftist is truly just envy. Envy hides in a multitude of forms and expressions. Envy is a basic human emotion, it is not a validity of pure intellectual motivation.
There is the envy of our Anglo-American civilization or Western Culture and especially of the innate qualities of mind and character which built it. This envy morphs into a strong drive to denigrate its sources and to believe that its wealth and benefits must be dispensed to those less fortunate.
There is the envy among academicians and intellectuals who instinctively resent the rewards and recognition of successful industrial, private enterprise. They are well aware that the qualities of leadership, courage and the ability to face reality in dealing with things are quite rare among them. They envy, thus denigrate, the man who is responsible for getting things done in spite of ruthless economic and natural obstacles. And yet they must begrudgingly accept that his achievements are the only source from which the leftist can "share the wealth" with others.
There are very few men in the hard-core left who have built their own fortunes. However even these individuals can be blinded into becoming useful idiots and even more likely are those whose fortunes are inherited. And if the society is a rich one with large accumulations of wealth from past accomplishments, the leftist is unfettered. His dispensing of seemingly endless funds of wealth allows him unbridled popularity and following with the masses. More and more useful idiots join the leftist ranks as they intellectualize discarding of the previous morality and truths.
Slowly, by degrees, the irreversible damage of the leftist trend becomes apparent to some. The national heritage, built upon ideals and principles and experience of many years of building and controlling a free society, slowly erodes away. Only at the last gasp of freedom and stability is it discovered that a civilization has been destroyed.
Simply, and less dramatically put, it is far more likely that the driving motivation behind the hard-core leftist is truly just envy. Envy hides in a multitude of forms and expressions. Envy is a basic human emotion, it is not a validity of pure intellectual motivation.
There is the envy of our Anglo-American civilization or Western Culture and especially of the innate qualities of mind and character which built it. This envy morphs into a strong drive to denigrate its sources and to believe that its wealth and benefits must be dispensed to those less fortunate.
There is the envy among academicians and intellectuals who instinctively resent the rewards and recognition of successful industrial, private enterprise. They are well aware that the qualities of leadership, courage and the ability to face reality in dealing with things are quite rare among them. They envy, thus denigrate, the man who is responsible for getting things done in spite of ruthless economic and natural obstacles. And yet they must begrudgingly accept that his achievements are the only source from which the leftist can "share the wealth" with others.
There are very few men in the hard-core left who have built their own fortunes. However even these individuals can be blinded into becoming useful idiots and even more likely are those whose fortunes are inherited. And if the society is a rich one with large accumulations of wealth from past accomplishments, the leftist is unfettered. His dispensing of seemingly endless funds of wealth allows him unbridled popularity and following with the masses. More and more useful idiots join the leftist ranks as they intellectualize discarding of the previous morality and truths.
Slowly, by degrees, the irreversible damage of the leftist trend becomes apparent to some. The national heritage, built upon ideals and principles and experience of many years of building and controlling a free society, slowly erodes away. Only at the last gasp of freedom and stability is it discovered that a civilization has been destroyed.
Monday, February 6, 2012
The Racial Gap
Material wealth is not the only thing that can be coveted or stolen. It also is possible to steal a nation's culture, or better stated, debase it. There exists no surer way of debasing or destroying a culture than integrating it with a race that is without the capacity to sustain it.
At first, in its widest sense, race can be separated into three broad subdivisions of the human species, the White, the Yellow and the Black. Anthropologists go deeper and to the point of five subdivisions being Caucasoid (White), Mongoloid (Yellow), Congoid (pure Black), Capoid (Yellow-Black) and Australoid (Yellow-Brown).
All of these racial divisions represent some degree of difference in innate characteristics, distinctive by observation of physical form. In very significant other words, the racial differences are genetic and indicate the presence of characteristic genes.
In a comparison of the American White man (Caucasoid) and the American Negro (West African Congoid) the results reflect the opposite poles of the human racial spectrum. These are not merely differences between sub-stocks inside one of the broader divisions -- these are differences between two of the largest human racial categories. And just as significant they indicate differences of position on the evolutionary scale as well. This means that if the typical Congoid Negro is the genetic essence of the Black and the European Caucasian an example of the White then we are coming as close to comparing the greatest gap possible between human beings, between American Negroes and American Whites.
At first, in its widest sense, race can be separated into three broad subdivisions of the human species, the White, the Yellow and the Black. Anthropologists go deeper and to the point of five subdivisions being Caucasoid (White), Mongoloid (Yellow), Congoid (pure Black), Capoid (Yellow-Black) and Australoid (Yellow-Brown).
All of these racial divisions represent some degree of difference in innate characteristics, distinctive by observation of physical form. In very significant other words, the racial differences are genetic and indicate the presence of characteristic genes.
In a comparison of the American White man (Caucasoid) and the American Negro (West African Congoid) the results reflect the opposite poles of the human racial spectrum. These are not merely differences between sub-stocks inside one of the broader divisions -- these are differences between two of the largest human racial categories. And just as significant they indicate differences of position on the evolutionary scale as well. This means that if the typical Congoid Negro is the genetic essence of the Black and the European Caucasian an example of the White then we are coming as close to comparing the greatest gap possible between human beings, between American Negroes and American Whites.
Sunday, February 5, 2012
Know Your Enemy
The real enemy of the American people is not centralized government by either political party but rather captive government by minority groups leading a New Orleans style Negro parade. A ludicrous spectacle followed by a motley gang of equalitarian fanatics, self-serving politicians and reverse discrimination by White traitors.
The present American Negro has the confused White populace on the run. It is a disgusting state of affairs. Why?
The American White race possesses the greatest technology on earth and enjoys the rewards of an advanced evolutionary status not only in self-government, standards of living and heritage but also in the power to enforce its will. Yet the White race cowers before the threats of a race far, far behind in evolutionary grade and with no weapons other than unproven equalitarian gibberish. It wrings its hands in frustration and is willing to be blackmailed for unlimited White-earned money and public degradation to placate and appease the violence prone Negro. There is no possible explanation for this boot licking other than it is a form of hypnosis, a trance brought on by an assumption of White guilt based on a totally erroneous conception of the facts.
All governments throughout history have been infected by varying degrees of financial dishonesty. But there is no known instance in which intellectual dishonesty has been so widespread and condoned and damaging as is today in the area of race in America. It is corrupting the integrity of otherwise decent citizens to an extent never witnessed before. And it is allowing the already corrupted, anti-American traitors to rise as far as the Presidency itself.
The present American Negro has the confused White populace on the run. It is a disgusting state of affairs. Why?
The American White race possesses the greatest technology on earth and enjoys the rewards of an advanced evolutionary status not only in self-government, standards of living and heritage but also in the power to enforce its will. Yet the White race cowers before the threats of a race far, far behind in evolutionary grade and with no weapons other than unproven equalitarian gibberish. It wrings its hands in frustration and is willing to be blackmailed for unlimited White-earned money and public degradation to placate and appease the violence prone Negro. There is no possible explanation for this boot licking other than it is a form of hypnosis, a trance brought on by an assumption of White guilt based on a totally erroneous conception of the facts.
All governments throughout history have been infected by varying degrees of financial dishonesty. But there is no known instance in which intellectual dishonesty has been so widespread and condoned and damaging as is today in the area of race in America. It is corrupting the integrity of otherwise decent citizens to an extent never witnessed before. And it is allowing the already corrupted, anti-American traitors to rise as far as the Presidency itself.
Cultural Revolution in America
In the equalitarian/socialist cultural revolution of the 1960s, a very prophetic threat was issued against White American culture. This threat and communist tactic was "we will take your children from you". And they did.
How did the activists of the cultural revolution succeed in doing this?
The first World War was an eye-opener for the communist followers of Marx and Engels. In every nation, on every side the common people rejected communist ploys to revolt against the respective national governments and cultures. The armies remained loyal to the existing leader of the nation.
This effectively ended the credibility of the old communist theories on "worker" rebellion. A new brand of communist theory and activism came into being: "cultural revolution". These communists realized that the only possible revolution of any nation had to start in the conversion of the individual citizen. This meant the long and subversive destroying of the beliefs and dependency of the individual upon the existing culture.
And what were the obstacles to be removed in a culture?
First, the family; second, the religion, third, the heritage of the nation, fourth, the restrictive personal moral codes of the people, fifth, the respect for authority and laws and then as the designer of this new cultural revolution (Gramsci) boasted "the citizenry will fall into our hands like ripe fruit". He was right on the money.
The family is to be portrayed as paternal tyranny, maternal psychosis, boring, stifling, and prone to sexual abuse.
Religion is to be dismissed as myth, no better than any other faith, suppression of women's and sexual rights.
The history and heritage of the culture is to be diminished in education, deemed to have violated minority rights, presented as no better than any other's past and to be hopelessly out-dated (determined by long dead White men) or (a Constitution out of touch with the present).
The moral standards of the people that resulted from national and religious precedents must be corrupted into a "do your own thing" loss of any morality at all. One of the prime goals of the communists was the acceptance of divorce as a natural and justifiable act of personal liberation.
The breakdown of respect and understanding of law and order unleashed the most violent, beastly manifestations of communist strategy. Suddenly the respected police officer on the beat was "a pig" and the youth vilifying him was "a freak". The breakdown went both ways.
The center for the gathering of the early cultural revolutionists (all Jews) was in Frankfurt, Germany, later to be referred to as "the Frankfurt School". In 1940, the Nazi plan to restrict the activities of German Jews forced the institution to re-locate to space provided for it at Columbia University in New York city.
From that liberal and Jewish haven, the cultural communists spread like cancer into the anthropology and social science departments of the major American universities. Their goal of cultural revolution never wavered.
They infiltrated the movie industry, the main stream press, the book publishing industry and especially in the television broadcasting industry.
By the end of the 1960s "hippie" or "flower child" cultural upheaval, the communists did indeed take a generation of American youths away from their parents and their heritage. The result of which is the incompetent, narcissistic, affirmative-action mulatto, Barack Hussein Obama.
How did the activists of the cultural revolution succeed in doing this?
The first World War was an eye-opener for the communist followers of Marx and Engels. In every nation, on every side the common people rejected communist ploys to revolt against the respective national governments and cultures. The armies remained loyal to the existing leader of the nation.
This effectively ended the credibility of the old communist theories on "worker" rebellion. A new brand of communist theory and activism came into being: "cultural revolution". These communists realized that the only possible revolution of any nation had to start in the conversion of the individual citizen. This meant the long and subversive destroying of the beliefs and dependency of the individual upon the existing culture.
And what were the obstacles to be removed in a culture?
First, the family; second, the religion, third, the heritage of the nation, fourth, the restrictive personal moral codes of the people, fifth, the respect for authority and laws and then as the designer of this new cultural revolution (Gramsci) boasted "the citizenry will fall into our hands like ripe fruit". He was right on the money.
The family is to be portrayed as paternal tyranny, maternal psychosis, boring, stifling, and prone to sexual abuse.
Religion is to be dismissed as myth, no better than any other faith, suppression of women's and sexual rights.
The history and heritage of the culture is to be diminished in education, deemed to have violated minority rights, presented as no better than any other's past and to be hopelessly out-dated (determined by long dead White men) or (a Constitution out of touch with the present).
The moral standards of the people that resulted from national and religious precedents must be corrupted into a "do your own thing" loss of any morality at all. One of the prime goals of the communists was the acceptance of divorce as a natural and justifiable act of personal liberation.
The breakdown of respect and understanding of law and order unleashed the most violent, beastly manifestations of communist strategy. Suddenly the respected police officer on the beat was "a pig" and the youth vilifying him was "a freak". The breakdown went both ways.
The center for the gathering of the early cultural revolutionists (all Jews) was in Frankfurt, Germany, later to be referred to as "the Frankfurt School". In 1940, the Nazi plan to restrict the activities of German Jews forced the institution to re-locate to space provided for it at Columbia University in New York city.
From that liberal and Jewish haven, the cultural communists spread like cancer into the anthropology and social science departments of the major American universities. Their goal of cultural revolution never wavered.
They infiltrated the movie industry, the main stream press, the book publishing industry and especially in the television broadcasting industry.
By the end of the 1960s "hippie" or "flower child" cultural upheaval, the communists did indeed take a generation of American youths away from their parents and their heritage. The result of which is the incompetent, narcissistic, affirmative-action mulatto, Barack Hussein Obama.
Thursday, February 2, 2012
Liberal Response or Lack Thereof
It has been very noticeable over 50 years of attempting to discuss racial or socialist matters with so-called liberal relatives or co-workers that any breakthrough of new facts or opinions at all contrary to their conformity is blindly rejected out of hand. And the liberal assumes a self-righteousness that vents hatred and scorn toward his opponent personally rather than ever feeling the moral duty to present facts, if any, regarding the subject at hand. And more delusional, to do so with a clear conscience.
In careful listening to these liberal people expound on equality or fairness, I find their motivations to be more dedicated to liberal conformity than ever dedicated to the truth. The roll of their eyes or their exasperated sighs are their only responses or expressions to being compelled to even listen to any point of view other than the stock liberal line. This also explains the inevitable, personal attack on anyone even close to threatening the liberal dogma on anything. The intensity of these personal attacks reach attempts to have the individual fired from his job even if the job itself had nothing to do with the matter, to instigate consumers to boycott a product or sponsorship, and to tie up opponents with needless legal suits or accusations.
I possess no credibility to judge these people's intelligence but there is a clue in their unfathomable persistence in defending discredited liberal political figures. One would imagine that the lies and deceptions of a Bill Clinton, the moral behavior of a Barney Frank and the obvious incompetence and disloyalty of a Barack Obama would convince a cretin to disown them but not so with the average liberal.
The answer is somewhere else and it is in the vast, uncontrollable entitlement programs which consume over a third of annual federal government spending. These programs are liberal "babies" and the left will elect even the most corrupt or mediocre politicians to protect them. And the Democrat politicians never object or call for any reductions in entitlements because those are guaranteed Democrat votes.
So when an Obama reveals that he has X million dollars for his 2012 re-election campaign, reality must add to that the X trillion dollars spent by his administration on entitlement programs and their guaranteed votes for the man. Very few recipients of entitlements are going to vote against the hand that feeds them.
In careful listening to these liberal people expound on equality or fairness, I find their motivations to be more dedicated to liberal conformity than ever dedicated to the truth. The roll of their eyes or their exasperated sighs are their only responses or expressions to being compelled to even listen to any point of view other than the stock liberal line. This also explains the inevitable, personal attack on anyone even close to threatening the liberal dogma on anything. The intensity of these personal attacks reach attempts to have the individual fired from his job even if the job itself had nothing to do with the matter, to instigate consumers to boycott a product or sponsorship, and to tie up opponents with needless legal suits or accusations.
I possess no credibility to judge these people's intelligence but there is a clue in their unfathomable persistence in defending discredited liberal political figures. One would imagine that the lies and deceptions of a Bill Clinton, the moral behavior of a Barney Frank and the obvious incompetence and disloyalty of a Barack Obama would convince a cretin to disown them but not so with the average liberal.
The answer is somewhere else and it is in the vast, uncontrollable entitlement programs which consume over a third of annual federal government spending. These programs are liberal "babies" and the left will elect even the most corrupt or mediocre politicians to protect them. And the Democrat politicians never object or call for any reductions in entitlements because those are guaranteed Democrat votes.
So when an Obama reveals that he has X million dollars for his 2012 re-election campaign, reality must add to that the X trillion dollars spent by his administration on entitlement programs and their guaranteed votes for the man. Very few recipients of entitlements are going to vote against the hand that feeds them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)