This re-examining of the American civil rights movement with its dominant fallacy of the non-existent equality of men will be repulsive to most readers in 2012. Because along with the success of the imposition of this blatantly erroneous equalitarian ideology was the equal success of suppression of the truth concerning the genetic foundation of life. This fallacy would be serious in academic circles, even in the fog of liberal individuals but far more serious in the nation's perception of race. This blindness to genetic racial limitations permitted America to embrace a fallacy and to corrupt its own citizens in its name. An initial falsehood remains false despite massive public support, legislation, judicial decisions or the passage of time. The equalitarian concept of equality of men is just as untrue in 2012 as in 1960. The people espousing it today are just as wrong as others were sixty years ago. The entire foundation of the civil rights movement was based upon a calculated lie.
Compounding this national tragedy was a concurrent tragedy. This was and is the erosion of the minds of seemingly sensible people until while in conceding that this fallacy was indeed fallacy, they soothed their consciences in compromise, appeasement and defeatism. They prostituted their ethics and their children's education to retain careers and social standing. They may have been sound at heart but despicable in their silence. These were not the Americans of a once native spirit that had built this nation.
Writing this in 2012 there is the need to clarify such accusations as to readers under 50 years of age. What such readers believe about racial equality is not false in their minds. Odds are the teachers who taught them this fallacy were not consciously deceiving as it is what they were taught. But for once discard your equalitarian blinders because the original premise of the civil rights movement was a deliberate, calculated falsehood. Its utterly implausible premise of racial equality was not believed or accepted by any other authorities of the time. Genetic racial limitations should have been undisputed. History taught it. Other free sciences confirmed it. It was not contested by anyone except the outright self-serving minority activists of the so-called civil rights movement whose skillful manipulation of social science and American innate desire for fairness fostered the direct opposite premise upon an unguarded nation.
For 50 years the defeatist rationale of appeasement has echoed and re-echoed. Its words varied from "it's too late", "what can we do about it now?", "it's settled law" to "we do not want to hear about it" to finally "stop bringing it up in mixed company". It is time long overdue to remind such hand-wringers that the answer to those and other cries of appeasement is to face up to the truth, express the truth, demand the truth in spite of any or all consequences. Never forget that equality of opportunity, the most important characteristic of America, was distorted to favor social, cultural and genetic equality. Equalitarian propaganda grasped the door of pity to deceive our hearts and minds. Environment became the basis of equalitarian judgements and yet somehow the environment declined as to inspirational values. Conformity dwarfed initiative. Security overshadowed enterprise. Distinction was disparaged to the point that excellence was destroyed. Social peace trumped true social justice. America lapsed into a trance-like hypnosis in order to believe and enforce the unbelievable. It is time for the sleeping beauty to awaken.
Monday, January 23, 2012
A Culture Upside Down
What truly happened during the civil rights movement of the 1960s?
A stable but gullible, trusting nation, the United States of America, was purposefully deceived and misled by certain activist groups, mostly of Jewish design, into not only believing but perpetrating that Negroes have an inborn capacity for western civilization equal to the white race. This subterfuge had nothing to do with Negro rights but for the own self-interest of these groups. This erroneous concept has for the next sixty years caused the government and the courts and the education system to feel morally justified, indeed obligated, in enforcing social integration and preferable treatment for the Negro. And, may I remind you, that the Negro of 1960 was not the propped up, affirmative action, hybrid of 2012. Even years after the start of the civil rights movement the Travelers Insurance Company would not underwrite life insurance for any Negro because of his lifestyle, health habits and short life span.
The average Negro of 1960 did not have the inborn capacity for western civilization and social integration with him invariably led in great part to the present deterioration of American society. An honest appraisal of present day Detroit, about to be taken over by the state of Michigan, should convince the most brain-washed liberal that Negroes cannot maintain stable governments when left to their own management. That despite all mandated, government attempts to bring the Negro to the level of the white race, when left on their own the Negroes self-destruct. The revealing images of the third world sub-culture of Negro America during the hurricane Katrina in New Orleans shocked America and the world.
But the equalitarian agenda of the civil rights minority groups also manifested itself in the socialist drifting to the left of the American culture and could never have been accepted or tolerated by the general public without the seeds of distortion and revisionism planted by earlier equalitarian activists. One must have lived through or have thoroughly studied the America of 1960 to fully grasp the decline in moral standards. When part of the mighty British army capitulated to Colonial forces in the Revolution, the British troops were forced
to lay down their arms and march away. As the British marched their bands played the song, "The World Turned Upside Down" to describe their disbelief and bafflement that a rag-tailed, civilian army had defeated part of the greatest army in the world. I feel the exact same disbelief and bafflement in comparing the moral standards of pre-1960 America to the decadent cesspool of today's America.
The present day discarding of the once moral standards of the nation is not a fruitful shedding of obsolete and racist vestiges of the past. It is the loss of direction of a once great and god-fearing nation. It is a loss based substantially upon one colossal error of fact, human equality. There is no such thing as equality in nature and surely no such thing as equality among men. The refusal to accept this obvious fact allowed into motion six decades of outright unjust mandates and the corrupting of American culture as a whole. Most readers under 60 years of age will be offended by those statements. They have been brain-washed and their focus of morality corrupted. To borrow from Jesus, "forgive them for they know not what they do."
A stable but gullible, trusting nation, the United States of America, was purposefully deceived and misled by certain activist groups, mostly of Jewish design, into not only believing but perpetrating that Negroes have an inborn capacity for western civilization equal to the white race. This subterfuge had nothing to do with Negro rights but for the own self-interest of these groups. This erroneous concept has for the next sixty years caused the government and the courts and the education system to feel morally justified, indeed obligated, in enforcing social integration and preferable treatment for the Negro. And, may I remind you, that the Negro of 1960 was not the propped up, affirmative action, hybrid of 2012. Even years after the start of the civil rights movement the Travelers Insurance Company would not underwrite life insurance for any Negro because of his lifestyle, health habits and short life span.
The average Negro of 1960 did not have the inborn capacity for western civilization and social integration with him invariably led in great part to the present deterioration of American society. An honest appraisal of present day Detroit, about to be taken over by the state of Michigan, should convince the most brain-washed liberal that Negroes cannot maintain stable governments when left to their own management. That despite all mandated, government attempts to bring the Negro to the level of the white race, when left on their own the Negroes self-destruct. The revealing images of the third world sub-culture of Negro America during the hurricane Katrina in New Orleans shocked America and the world.
But the equalitarian agenda of the civil rights minority groups also manifested itself in the socialist drifting to the left of the American culture and could never have been accepted or tolerated by the general public without the seeds of distortion and revisionism planted by earlier equalitarian activists. One must have lived through or have thoroughly studied the America of 1960 to fully grasp the decline in moral standards. When part of the mighty British army capitulated to Colonial forces in the Revolution, the British troops were forced
to lay down their arms and march away. As the British marched their bands played the song, "The World Turned Upside Down" to describe their disbelief and bafflement that a rag-tailed, civilian army had defeated part of the greatest army in the world. I feel the exact same disbelief and bafflement in comparing the moral standards of pre-1960 America to the decadent cesspool of today's America.
The present day discarding of the once moral standards of the nation is not a fruitful shedding of obsolete and racist vestiges of the past. It is the loss of direction of a once great and god-fearing nation. It is a loss based substantially upon one colossal error of fact, human equality. There is no such thing as equality in nature and surely no such thing as equality among men. The refusal to accept this obvious fact allowed into motion six decades of outright unjust mandates and the corrupting of American culture as a whole. Most readers under 60 years of age will be offended by those statements. They have been brain-washed and their focus of morality corrupted. To borrow from Jesus, "forgive them for they know not what they do."
Thursday, January 5, 2012
Follow the Integration Star (of David)
Reader's caution. This blog contains personal opinion which is accusative of the Jewish influence, motivation and activism in the progressive movements to replace the scientific doctrines of racial equality with the present equalitarian theories of racial equality. This involvement of this particular Jewish group was major, self-serving and deliberate.
Until 1880 the American racial stocks were loosely defined by Theodore Roosevelt in 1881 as "English-Speaking". The Americans and the British were two basically similar branches of the English race which before and after American independence assimilated and made "Englishmen" of many other peoples. In America the pure English blood of New England infused with the blood of the Dutch, of the German, of the Scandinavian and of the Irish and produced composite racial stock of descendants as "Anglo-American" as ever.
In the 1880's conditions changed dramatically. Immigration to the US shifted from northern Europe to eastern and southern Europe thus newer branches of the white race with vast different temperaments and traditions arrived in greater and greater numbers. Some of these stocks came from backgrounds of the highest culture but most of the new arrivals were from stocks that had not been able to maintain stable, free societies. Many were state-less European Jews.
These new arrivals were not readily or willingly assimilated into the prevailing American stock or culture. And some Jews smarting under truly unjust discrimination became obsessed with proving that they not only were just as good as the native Americans but religiously and culturally superior. The Jews were ever mindful in keeping their own stock pure but had no hesitation in meddling in the affairs of others. With clear and ulterior purpose certain groups of Jews embarked on the apparently spontaneous movement to establish that all races were equal in their adaptability to the white, American civilization.
This entailed Jews being well educated, staunch in career purpose, given full Jewish community support and financing; all with the goal of reaching positions of influence in education and the social sciences. One result was that important chairs of anthropology and sociology in many leading universities were eventually taken over by men from such Jewish groups. So by the 1930's several generations of American youth had come under such influence. The outcome was the exploitation of equalitarian theories in anthropology and related theories in the field of sociology.
To clarify my belief as to Jewish involvement in the equalitarian movement, I must add here that membership in the Jewish, or other, race by no means determines membership in a specific group. Indeed the main impetus of the actual civil rights movement stemmed from non-Jewish useful idiots who let their hearts fog their heads. Some carved out lifetime careers as entertainers or writers by openly milking the fervor and emotion of the turmoil of the time.
It was only a slight progression to adopting these new equalitarian theories and applying them to the new battle cry, integration. It now appears that this application of theories was far more to entrench or solidify them in the sciences and to propel the goals of the Jewish groups. Freedom and advancement of the negro were not the true goal but rather a useful, distracting cover.
What is mystifying to me is that these white activists be they Jewish or whatever should propagate false theories and doctrines which were bound to weaken the white race as a whole. In present day Israel is it called the "Samson option" in reference to mutual nuclear obliteration. Why would any rational persons risk pulling down the pillars of the temple upon their very heads? Especially if they were not even sincere about their actions. This self-serving treason was repugnant to me then and now.
But, to repeat, there would be no greater injustice or historical error than to accuse all of the Jewish immigrants of the time of participating in or even sharing in the above conspiracy or promoting its policies.
One last point. As to the inevitable liberal rebuttals, then and now, which would parrot transparent attempts to deflect annoying truths by ridicule including ,with a patronizing sneer, quoting older "authorities", consider the following as perhaps appearing in a math textbook in 2012.
"Prior to 2000 it was the fashion to suppose 2 + 2 = 4. Now every one knows that in light of advanced research that it is utterly mind boggling that this belief could be universally accepted. Dr Ohne Tattergreis actually writes that 2 + 2 = 4 in several of her textbooks but the dates of these books now suffice to discredit her. As any well informed person knows, about 1999, and with increasing validity ever since, science began to discover that 2 + 2 = 6. Today, in 2012, despite persistent lingering of some to the past, no reputable scientist would suggest anything else. For further discussion, see Chapters 14 & 22."
Until 1880 the American racial stocks were loosely defined by Theodore Roosevelt in 1881 as "English-Speaking". The Americans and the British were two basically similar branches of the English race which before and after American independence assimilated and made "Englishmen" of many other peoples. In America the pure English blood of New England infused with the blood of the Dutch, of the German, of the Scandinavian and of the Irish and produced composite racial stock of descendants as "Anglo-American" as ever.
In the 1880's conditions changed dramatically. Immigration to the US shifted from northern Europe to eastern and southern Europe thus newer branches of the white race with vast different temperaments and traditions arrived in greater and greater numbers. Some of these stocks came from backgrounds of the highest culture but most of the new arrivals were from stocks that had not been able to maintain stable, free societies. Many were state-less European Jews.
These new arrivals were not readily or willingly assimilated into the prevailing American stock or culture. And some Jews smarting under truly unjust discrimination became obsessed with proving that they not only were just as good as the native Americans but religiously and culturally superior. The Jews were ever mindful in keeping their own stock pure but had no hesitation in meddling in the affairs of others. With clear and ulterior purpose certain groups of Jews embarked on the apparently spontaneous movement to establish that all races were equal in their adaptability to the white, American civilization.
This entailed Jews being well educated, staunch in career purpose, given full Jewish community support and financing; all with the goal of reaching positions of influence in education and the social sciences. One result was that important chairs of anthropology and sociology in many leading universities were eventually taken over by men from such Jewish groups. So by the 1930's several generations of American youth had come under such influence. The outcome was the exploitation of equalitarian theories in anthropology and related theories in the field of sociology.
To clarify my belief as to Jewish involvement in the equalitarian movement, I must add here that membership in the Jewish, or other, race by no means determines membership in a specific group. Indeed the main impetus of the actual civil rights movement stemmed from non-Jewish useful idiots who let their hearts fog their heads. Some carved out lifetime careers as entertainers or writers by openly milking the fervor and emotion of the turmoil of the time.
It was only a slight progression to adopting these new equalitarian theories and applying them to the new battle cry, integration. It now appears that this application of theories was far more to entrench or solidify them in the sciences and to propel the goals of the Jewish groups. Freedom and advancement of the negro were not the true goal but rather a useful, distracting cover.
What is mystifying to me is that these white activists be they Jewish or whatever should propagate false theories and doctrines which were bound to weaken the white race as a whole. In present day Israel is it called the "Samson option" in reference to mutual nuclear obliteration. Why would any rational persons risk pulling down the pillars of the temple upon their very heads? Especially if they were not even sincere about their actions. This self-serving treason was repugnant to me then and now.
But, to repeat, there would be no greater injustice or historical error than to accuse all of the Jewish immigrants of the time of participating in or even sharing in the above conspiracy or promoting its policies.
One last point. As to the inevitable liberal rebuttals, then and now, which would parrot transparent attempts to deflect annoying truths by ridicule including ,with a patronizing sneer, quoting older "authorities", consider the following as perhaps appearing in a math textbook in 2012.
"Prior to 2000 it was the fashion to suppose 2 + 2 = 4. Now every one knows that in light of advanced research that it is utterly mind boggling that this belief could be universally accepted. Dr Ohne Tattergreis actually writes that 2 + 2 = 4 in several of her textbooks but the dates of these books now suffice to discredit her. As any well informed person knows, about 1999, and with increasing validity ever since, science began to discover that 2 + 2 = 6. Today, in 2012, despite persistent lingering of some to the past, no reputable scientist would suggest anything else. For further discussion, see Chapters 14 & 22."
Wednesday, January 4, 2012
The Equality Bell
It is difficult to explain to and perhaps unfair to expect from any one born after 1950 to fully grasp the impact that the two decades from 1930 to 1950 of equalitarian ideological pressure forced upon the sciences in America. The entire concept of the nature of man was turned on its head. What had been considered solid, researched theories on race, gender, community, religion and equality for 100 years were flipped over like a pancake. But no other of these were as pressured and distorted to the degree as equality. Because ideological equality was the bed rock of socialism, communism and of the American progressive movement.
The collectivists which included socialists and communists had learned a hard lesson in the first quarter of the 20th century. Against basic Marxist theory, the US labor force strongly resisted communist attempts to agitate the average worker into rebellion let alone revolution. Most of the large manufacturing jobs were unionized or fairly paid with benefits. And communist influences in the large unions were exposed and driven out in time.
The collectivists turned the focus and hopes for civil unrest and revolution upon the American Negro. The Southern segregation of the negro and the more subtle but just as vehement racial attitudes of the rest of the country toward him were exactly the type of gunpowder to explode into racial turmoil and national disruption. The foreign communists of the time aided, abetted and subsidized the so-called "civil rights" movement. It melded nicely with their equalitarian ideas and practices. The emotional propaganda that was spewed out converted thousands of useful idiots to organize "sit-ins", boycotts, marches and finally legislation.
What could be more natural and believable than that a movement calling itself Civil Rights here, Communism in the USSR, Marxism somewhere and Socialism somewhere else would in its strategy focus on the subversion of the social sciences as well as governments? And these "isms" all having the common base of equalitarianism. Quickly the subversion wormed its way into the Protestant churches using a hollow appeal for pity, Christian love and concern for the underdog in order to make the equalitarian fallacy more acceptable. The underdog always portrayed as a victim of some nebulous oppression but never of his own conduct. The negro underdog now to made to appear as the equal in all innate capacity.
The long held and valid American doctrine of equality of opportunity had been subverted into a manifesto of social, cultural, economic and genetic equality. By 1954 this subversion was reflected in the thinking of the Supreme Court and in its judgement by issuing its desegregation order.
None of this was done in accordance with long held, true American values. None of this was even American. A moderate amount of subterfuge may be tolerated for strictly charity's sake. But no American of 1954 or of 2012, now cognizant of the truth, should tolerate any further continuance of this equalitarian treason and should demand its obliteration from our shores. Just what is the original definition of the word, equality?
The true intent and foundation of the American ideal concept of equality is to be found in Jefferson's original copy of the Declaration of Independence. The original words were "All men are born equally free". In addition, Jefferson followed the phrase "All men are created equal" with "they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights .... among which are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness". Liberty was given the same importance as equality. The only sense in which equality can exist along with liberty is in the sense of equality of opportunity and equality before the law. Because if men are free they will not be equal and where men are equal they are not free. Just compare the freedom of opportunity in America as derived from the varied abilities of its citizens to the cookie-cutter equality of the former USSR with its absence of freedom. To repeat: liberty and equality cannot exist together. The enforcement of racial equality in the US is in proportion to its loss of liberty. For every set-aside or affirmative action job filled to attempt equality there is the loss of liberty for the applicant not favored.
Also always keep in mind that the Declaration of Independence is not the basis of our government. The Constitution is the basis and in its stated purpose no mention is made of equality.
The collectivists which included socialists and communists had learned a hard lesson in the first quarter of the 20th century. Against basic Marxist theory, the US labor force strongly resisted communist attempts to agitate the average worker into rebellion let alone revolution. Most of the large manufacturing jobs were unionized or fairly paid with benefits. And communist influences in the large unions were exposed and driven out in time.
The collectivists turned the focus and hopes for civil unrest and revolution upon the American Negro. The Southern segregation of the negro and the more subtle but just as vehement racial attitudes of the rest of the country toward him were exactly the type of gunpowder to explode into racial turmoil and national disruption. The foreign communists of the time aided, abetted and subsidized the so-called "civil rights" movement. It melded nicely with their equalitarian ideas and practices. The emotional propaganda that was spewed out converted thousands of useful idiots to organize "sit-ins", boycotts, marches and finally legislation.
What could be more natural and believable than that a movement calling itself Civil Rights here, Communism in the USSR, Marxism somewhere and Socialism somewhere else would in its strategy focus on the subversion of the social sciences as well as governments? And these "isms" all having the common base of equalitarianism. Quickly the subversion wormed its way into the Protestant churches using a hollow appeal for pity, Christian love and concern for the underdog in order to make the equalitarian fallacy more acceptable. The underdog always portrayed as a victim of some nebulous oppression but never of his own conduct. The negro underdog now to made to appear as the equal in all innate capacity.
The long held and valid American doctrine of equality of opportunity had been subverted into a manifesto of social, cultural, economic and genetic equality. By 1954 this subversion was reflected in the thinking of the Supreme Court and in its judgement by issuing its desegregation order.
None of this was done in accordance with long held, true American values. None of this was even American. A moderate amount of subterfuge may be tolerated for strictly charity's sake. But no American of 1954 or of 2012, now cognizant of the truth, should tolerate any further continuance of this equalitarian treason and should demand its obliteration from our shores. Just what is the original definition of the word, equality?
The true intent and foundation of the American ideal concept of equality is to be found in Jefferson's original copy of the Declaration of Independence. The original words were "All men are born equally free". In addition, Jefferson followed the phrase "All men are created equal" with "they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights .... among which are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness". Liberty was given the same importance as equality. The only sense in which equality can exist along with liberty is in the sense of equality of opportunity and equality before the law. Because if men are free they will not be equal and where men are equal they are not free. Just compare the freedom of opportunity in America as derived from the varied abilities of its citizens to the cookie-cutter equality of the former USSR with its absence of freedom. To repeat: liberty and equality cannot exist together. The enforcement of racial equality in the US is in proportion to its loss of liberty. For every set-aside or affirmative action job filled to attempt equality there is the loss of liberty for the applicant not favored.
Also always keep in mind that the Declaration of Independence is not the basis of our government. The Constitution is the basis and in its stated purpose no mention is made of equality.
Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Prophetic Hindsight
By 1960 no American anthropologist or sociologist would find employment if he openly endorsed the provable racial inequality of man.
Starting with a strong northeastern nucleus, equalitarian social anthropologists captured important positions in most northern and west coast universities.
This was aided and abetted by equalitarians in government, the entertainment field and, most effective, in the main stream press. This has created and dominated public opinion in these areas and has for 50 years rendered it virtually impossible for anyone disagreeing to retain his position or even his social standing. This being just another example of the equalitarian brandishing the economic club over any serious opponent.
Never in US history have the main stream press and the other media of public communication so strangled and suppressed the beliefs of such a vast majority of citizens.
The once impartial newspapers, magazines, broadcast networks sunk to sheer equalitarian propaganda. This completed a troika of conspiracy, fraud and intimidation. Conspiracy to gain control of the centers of education and news dissemination; fraud in teaching provably false racial doctrines; and intimidation by savagely attacking and suppressing any one who dared to speak the truth. For over 50 years it has been sheer hypocrisy to speak of freedom of the main stream press or of any other kind when such deliberate suppression of open and honest viewpoints is allowed to exist.
To look to history for explanation be aware that the so called civil rights movement first appeared in 1866 along with other radical, utopian, social reforms coming from the peculiar reform culture of the equalitarian North. Not all of these reforms were related to slavery.
In hindsight, the fears and perceptions of the South were right on target. Everything that the secessionists warned about has since come true, true beyond their worst nightmares. The "Negro" has been hoaxed into the "African-American" and has been elevated above Whites by liberal, equalitarian fanatics. This modern liberal has even come so far as to deny the very existence of racial differences and instead has tarred White racial identity as somehow evil and provocative. Grey walls of political correctness and racial conformity now imprison the entire nation.
Now in the 21st century the same fanatical equalitarian specter that destroyed the Confederacy and 20th century anthropology has turned against the White citizens of the North and West, whose very ancestors fought for the Union. It has turned against Western Civilization itself.
Starting with a strong northeastern nucleus, equalitarian social anthropologists captured important positions in most northern and west coast universities.
This was aided and abetted by equalitarians in government, the entertainment field and, most effective, in the main stream press. This has created and dominated public opinion in these areas and has for 50 years rendered it virtually impossible for anyone disagreeing to retain his position or even his social standing. This being just another example of the equalitarian brandishing the economic club over any serious opponent.
Never in US history have the main stream press and the other media of public communication so strangled and suppressed the beliefs of such a vast majority of citizens.
The once impartial newspapers, magazines, broadcast networks sunk to sheer equalitarian propaganda. This completed a troika of conspiracy, fraud and intimidation. Conspiracy to gain control of the centers of education and news dissemination; fraud in teaching provably false racial doctrines; and intimidation by savagely attacking and suppressing any one who dared to speak the truth. For over 50 years it has been sheer hypocrisy to speak of freedom of the main stream press or of any other kind when such deliberate suppression of open and honest viewpoints is allowed to exist.
To look to history for explanation be aware that the so called civil rights movement first appeared in 1866 along with other radical, utopian, social reforms coming from the peculiar reform culture of the equalitarian North. Not all of these reforms were related to slavery.
In hindsight, the fears and perceptions of the South were right on target. Everything that the secessionists warned about has since come true, true beyond their worst nightmares. The "Negro" has been hoaxed into the "African-American" and has been elevated above Whites by liberal, equalitarian fanatics. This modern liberal has even come so far as to deny the very existence of racial differences and instead has tarred White racial identity as somehow evil and provocative. Grey walls of political correctness and racial conformity now imprison the entire nation.
Now in the 21st century the same fanatical equalitarian specter that destroyed the Confederacy and 20th century anthropology has turned against the White citizens of the North and West, whose very ancestors fought for the Union. It has turned against Western Civilization itself.
My Frame of Reasoning
My blogs as of now are designed to be of a very broad analysis of HOW certain American values were first deviously undermined, next propagandized to be obsolete and finally discarded. I have lived through and was politically active in the period of time I hope to expose. My personal opinions as to the American Negro were formulated by working as an investigator and outside bill collector in New Haven CT, my experiences enlisting in the regular army (RA) during the Korean conflict and serving with only the second tier of draftees in the US army following President Truman's order that the army be desegregated, as a police officer in North Haven Ct, and by over 50 years of deep interest and study of the race.
I lived in the Newport News area of Virginia during southern segregation of negroes and was thoroughly convinced of the validity of segregation. Only then did I realize what misconceptions the North held as to the average negro man or woman and how morally unjust it would be to force desegregation upon that section of the nation. I worked with and associated with southern whites and came face to face with the disgraceful treatment by the North to its fellow southern citizens both before and during Reconstruction of the 1861 war between the states. That bloody, unnecessary conflict was not a "civil war". A civil war exists when there is contention for the government of the nation. The South never intended to occupy Washington DC. The South was seceding FROM the Union not attempting to take control of it. The South just desired to be free of the meddlesome, equalitarian, uncouth mishmash of socialist rabble that dominated the North then and dominates America now. Few other words can capture the tragic loss of Southern values and culture than the title of Margaret Mitchell's novel .... "Gone with the Wind". Years of Southern nobility scattered to the wind like dry dandelion seed.
This is all may be dusty history to some but its truths and principles are even more pertinent today What the civil rights equalitarians have never understood or accepted is that social status, as anything of worth, must be earned. True, lasting equality of association has to be mutually agreed to. It cannot and never will be gained by arbitrary force or edict of law.
I hold no personal animosity toward the negro. No negro has ever harmed me in any way. One of kindest non-com I knew was a negro master sergeant. But just like with a child or loved one there are facts that any human with two eyes must see despite the relationship. Facts as to pure-blooded negroes like:
The honest (not contrived) number of blacks who have contributed to great literature, engineering, medicine, philosophy, or abstract science. Athletic prowess or musical talent are not matters of character or intelligence. To be frank, other than NBA basketball and hip-hop culture, in what areas do negroes on their own merit stand out? I agree that equality of opportunity and equality before the law, if with honest intent, are necessary and should be enforced by the law as far as reasonably possible. But, to repeat, to desegregate presupposed an achieved status which the the average negro had not yet earned. The compelling of desegregation has unleashed over 50 years of smoldering opposition and outright negro cultural mayhem.
The equality concept or doctrine in general without a facade of propaganda is so pitifully untenable that it falls to pieces at the slightest serious, thoughtful examination.
I lived in the Newport News area of Virginia during southern segregation of negroes and was thoroughly convinced of the validity of segregation. Only then did I realize what misconceptions the North held as to the average negro man or woman and how morally unjust it would be to force desegregation upon that section of the nation. I worked with and associated with southern whites and came face to face with the disgraceful treatment by the North to its fellow southern citizens both before and during Reconstruction of the 1861 war between the states. That bloody, unnecessary conflict was not a "civil war". A civil war exists when there is contention for the government of the nation. The South never intended to occupy Washington DC. The South was seceding FROM the Union not attempting to take control of it. The South just desired to be free of the meddlesome, equalitarian, uncouth mishmash of socialist rabble that dominated the North then and dominates America now. Few other words can capture the tragic loss of Southern values and culture than the title of Margaret Mitchell's novel .... "Gone with the Wind". Years of Southern nobility scattered to the wind like dry dandelion seed.
This is all may be dusty history to some but its truths and principles are even more pertinent today What the civil rights equalitarians have never understood or accepted is that social status, as anything of worth, must be earned. True, lasting equality of association has to be mutually agreed to. It cannot and never will be gained by arbitrary force or edict of law.
I hold no personal animosity toward the negro. No negro has ever harmed me in any way. One of kindest non-com I knew was a negro master sergeant. But just like with a child or loved one there are facts that any human with two eyes must see despite the relationship. Facts as to pure-blooded negroes like:
The honest (not contrived) number of blacks who have contributed to great literature, engineering, medicine, philosophy, or abstract science. Athletic prowess or musical talent are not matters of character or intelligence. To be frank, other than NBA basketball and hip-hop culture, in what areas do negroes on their own merit stand out? I agree that equality of opportunity and equality before the law, if with honest intent, are necessary and should be enforced by the law as far as reasonably possible. But, to repeat, to desegregate presupposed an achieved status which the the average negro had not yet earned. The compelling of desegregation has unleashed over 50 years of smoldering opposition and outright negro cultural mayhem.
The equality concept or doctrine in general without a facade of propaganda is so pitifully untenable that it falls to pieces at the slightest serious, thoughtful examination.
Sunday, January 1, 2012
The Mixed-Blood Deception
From 1900 the aim of the progressives was to methodically install equalitarianism in every college faculty, every social scientist and every facet of American influence, entertainment and literature.
This was not accomplished by chance or through the will or vote of the people. It was imposed by causing the fracture and discarding of American culture and values. They relentlessly used the law, the courts and even the Constitution to further their ends. The progressives have long reached the power to effect their own legislation.
This equalitarian victory was most prevalent in the decisions and enforcement of so-called civil rights.
It was vital to silence reputable challenges to their untenable theories and findings on race. This solidified a base of useful idiots in condemning any discussion of the innate limitations of the negro. To even question this would bring down possible loss of career, social disdain, and even legal actions.
And there was a very little discussed weapon in this equalitarian deception. A race card to be dealt whenever needed to defend appearances or distort scientific tests. This was the mixed-blood individual.
The truly fair way to compare races is by comparing average vs average. Not as the progressives tried to hoodwink by comparing the best of negroes against the worst of whites. There was the mixture of white and negro blood everywhere in the country but it was far more common in the North. Thus the judgments and decisions of Northerners were subject to deception and often based only on half of the evidence that could be contrary to equalitarian theory. The Northern voter had almost no opportunity to evaluate or decide upon the pure blooded negroes of the South. They had never seen or spoken to a southern negro field hand.
Today in 2012 a mixed-blood is President. Meaningful or not, it is very unlikely for a pure blooded negro (if there is any then) to be nominated for or elected President for a long time.
This was not accomplished by chance or through the will or vote of the people. It was imposed by causing the fracture and discarding of American culture and values. They relentlessly used the law, the courts and even the Constitution to further their ends. The progressives have long reached the power to effect their own legislation.
This equalitarian victory was most prevalent in the decisions and enforcement of so-called civil rights.
It was vital to silence reputable challenges to their untenable theories and findings on race. This solidified a base of useful idiots in condemning any discussion of the innate limitations of the negro. To even question this would bring down possible loss of career, social disdain, and even legal actions.
And there was a very little discussed weapon in this equalitarian deception. A race card to be dealt whenever needed to defend appearances or distort scientific tests. This was the mixed-blood individual.
The truly fair way to compare races is by comparing average vs average. Not as the progressives tried to hoodwink by comparing the best of negroes against the worst of whites. There was the mixture of white and negro blood everywhere in the country but it was far more common in the North. Thus the judgments and decisions of Northerners were subject to deception and often based only on half of the evidence that could be contrary to equalitarian theory. The Northern voter had almost no opportunity to evaluate or decide upon the pure blooded negroes of the South. They had never seen or spoken to a southern negro field hand.
Today in 2012 a mixed-blood is President. Meaningful or not, it is very unlikely for a pure blooded negro (if there is any then) to be nominated for or elected President for a long time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)