Where had the courage gone over the last sixty years that was needed to tell the truth about racial limitations and differences? Because politically correct or not, the truth is that there is no equality in nature and doubly not so among the races of mankind.
What a pitiful, cowardly plight has befallen America with a misled, unnecessarily guilt-ridden majority of citizens entranced by false equalitarian dogma on race. A submissive mass media propagandizing the public with a scientific fraud. An America governed by a life-time hierarchy of political and judicial leaders with mediocre minds, little moral stamina and prostituting the truth to pander for minority votes. Tragedies compounded by the elections of these fools who came from a citizenry emasculated by several generations of compromise and sickening appeasement. That cringing appeasement being to the Negro race which like any parasite only demanded more and more.
The only answer is that the equalitarian dogma, like a diseased growth, contains within itself not only the seeds of proliferation, but the curse of inevitable societal collapse as well.
As to courage, let a man be told and taught incessantly that everything his forefathers had achieved was largely a matter of chance, the so-called lottery of life; that the perpetual poverty and ignorance of the Negro was not only a question of bad luck but more than likely the fault of himself and his White forefathers; that America's once standards of morals, fiscal responsibility and personal integrity were no better than those of any other culture; that the success of America was mostly by good fortune and nothing to be proud about as it was built upon the backs of Negro slaves; all humanity were innately equal and any distinctions were due to environmental causes - no, let any man have these lies drummed into him over and over and eventually his values and his courage to uphold them will change and deteriorate.
This change, this deterioration must soon spread its venom through the family, the community and the nation. This breakdown of morality is quickly sensed by the criminal, the disgruntled employee, the impressionable teenager and the indifferent teacher. No longer are fashionable the words, "distinguished" or "discriminating". In foolishly defending the present denial of any racial inferiority, the equalitarians necessarily had to destroy any concepts of racial superiority, because one concept could not exist along with the other.
With the neutralizing of racial superiority came the end of respect for authority, the end in the pride in the achievements of the past, the end in honoring the heritage of one's family, in honoring one's race, even in honoring one's country. Dragged down were those men of superior quality who had confidence in their own personal excellence and in their peers and in their race. This was the most serious loss as with it passed the genius of true leadership and the power and will to "raise up" rather than "level down".
Indeed what was lost were those qualities which had given Americans the courage to tell the truth.
Sunday, January 29, 2012
Saturday, January 28, 2012
Define Your Terms
The bulk of my recent posts have come from personal notes and writings from over the past years.
This way I am re-writing about events and opinions that I actually have experienced.
I refer constantly to the words "equalitarian" and "equalitarianism". These are not legitimate words. I came across them many years ago in a book by a very prophetic writer, Carleton Putnam, who passed away in 1998.
This Mr. Putnam's definition of "equalitarian".
" One who subscribes to the dogma that for all practical purposes all races are innately (genetically) equal in intelligence and character, and that the differences between them are due chiefly to environment rather than heredity".
Note that this definition could be easily applied to the word, "communist".
This way I am re-writing about events and opinions that I actually have experienced.
I refer constantly to the words "equalitarian" and "equalitarianism". These are not legitimate words. I came across them many years ago in a book by a very prophetic writer, Carleton Putnam, who passed away in 1998.
This Mr. Putnam's definition of "equalitarian".
" One who subscribes to the dogma that for all practical purposes all races are innately (genetically) equal in intelligence and character, and that the differences between them are due chiefly to environment rather than heredity".
Note that this definition could be easily applied to the word, "communist".
Face Racial Facts
The colossal distortions of two facts constituted the main impetus of the equalitarian, left-wing agenda that had been allowed to infect then dominate racial opinions in the United States.
That first fact, long held for years, was that there is no such thing as equality in nature, surely not among men.
The equalitarian scheme to conceal this obvious fact and to purposefully contradict it has resulted in sixty years of corruption of American humanity. But all these sixty disruptive years, all of the resulting insane political correctness, all of the cowardly silence and appeasement, all of the losses of American standing in the world have not yet convinced the indoctrinated American people that they have been deceived and betrayed.
Intended or not, what destructive manifestations have appeared in America since 1950?
They are the decline of moral standards, the disrespect for distinction and authority, the appalling lowering of educational standards, the loss of juvenile control, the sordid descent of literature and entertainment, and in the inevitable corrupting of politicians to seek votes instead of principles. Also manifested are the rising violent crime rate by Negroes, punitive taxes and restrictions, government partiality to labor unions, the lack of discipline and workmanship in the labor force, the purposeful elimination of a servant class and the disgraceful appeasement of evil, mediocrity and outright lawlessness in many other aspects of American life.
The second proven fact was that the Negro, wherever on earth, did not have the inborn capacity for Western Civilization and that social integration with him invariably produced deterioration in any White civilization that was foolish enough to try it. For proof of that, consider:
In all of history there had never been one single case of a stable, free civilization that was predominantly, or even substantially, Negro.
In all of history there had never been one single case in which a White civilization did not fail to deteriorate after integrating with Negroes.
In all history there had never been a case in which Whites and Negroes lived together unsegregated and failed to intermarry.
In all of history there is not a better example and proof of a Negro society left to its own resources after previous contact with White civilization than the Republic of Haiti. There is nothing in the Voodoo religion, the government of Haiti, its laws, its public education, its finances, or its culture that even suggests equality with any White culture or society.
Most important, in all of history what opportunities has the White man had that he did not make for himself and what opportunities or chances did the Negro lack that he could not have made for himself, had the Negro the innate capacity? The full-blooded Negro of Africa in all his years of existence and on his own, never developed the concepts of the wheel or the sail.
In essence, in the early 1950s the American people were not given the long-standing evidence on the innate racial capacities and variability of the American Negro. The people were knowingly allowed to judge for themselves the validity and soundness of proposed public policies on race based upon only undocumented assertions which all the available, existing evidence contradicted.
That first fact, long held for years, was that there is no such thing as equality in nature, surely not among men.
The equalitarian scheme to conceal this obvious fact and to purposefully contradict it has resulted in sixty years of corruption of American humanity. But all these sixty disruptive years, all of the resulting insane political correctness, all of the cowardly silence and appeasement, all of the losses of American standing in the world have not yet convinced the indoctrinated American people that they have been deceived and betrayed.
Intended or not, what destructive manifestations have appeared in America since 1950?
They are the decline of moral standards, the disrespect for distinction and authority, the appalling lowering of educational standards, the loss of juvenile control, the sordid descent of literature and entertainment, and in the inevitable corrupting of politicians to seek votes instead of principles. Also manifested are the rising violent crime rate by Negroes, punitive taxes and restrictions, government partiality to labor unions, the lack of discipline and workmanship in the labor force, the purposeful elimination of a servant class and the disgraceful appeasement of evil, mediocrity and outright lawlessness in many other aspects of American life.
The second proven fact was that the Negro, wherever on earth, did not have the inborn capacity for Western Civilization and that social integration with him invariably produced deterioration in any White civilization that was foolish enough to try it. For proof of that, consider:
In all of history there had never been one single case of a stable, free civilization that was predominantly, or even substantially, Negro.
In all of history there had never been one single case in which a White civilization did not fail to deteriorate after integrating with Negroes.
In all history there had never been a case in which Whites and Negroes lived together unsegregated and failed to intermarry.
In all of history there is not a better example and proof of a Negro society left to its own resources after previous contact with White civilization than the Republic of Haiti. There is nothing in the Voodoo religion, the government of Haiti, its laws, its public education, its finances, or its culture that even suggests equality with any White culture or society.
Most important, in all of history what opportunities has the White man had that he did not make for himself and what opportunities or chances did the Negro lack that he could not have made for himself, had the Negro the innate capacity? The full-blooded Negro of Africa in all his years of existence and on his own, never developed the concepts of the wheel or the sail.
In essence, in the early 1950s the American people were not given the long-standing evidence on the innate racial capacities and variability of the American Negro. The people were knowingly allowed to judge for themselves the validity and soundness of proposed public policies on race based upon only undocumented assertions which all the available, existing evidence contradicted.
Friday, January 27, 2012
Black Blackmail
For the first half of the 20th century the specter of massive Negro rioting was countered by an unwritten truce between Negro leaders and the federal government. Starting in 1950 this undeclared truce began to break down. This culminated in the decade of 1960 - 1969 with uncontrollable Negro violence in major cities. The New York subway system was virtually shut down do to roaming, young Negroes terrorizing the subways.
The bizarre, self-inflicting cry of "Burn baby, burn" was gleefully shouted as Negroes torched their own neighborhoods, very reminiscent of the senseless destruction that would occur in Africa itself.
The Negro mayhem was stopped on a dime for one reason - Negro blackmail of the United States government.
Using the civil rights movement as a convenient, face-saving cover, the United States guaranteed the Negro leaders preferential treatment in education, housing, employment and subsistence to the Negro race. Barriers to Negro restriction of association with whites such as schools, public transportation, public facilities and the military were to be rapidly and legally removed. Of course this eventually was not enough for certain so-called Negro leaders who threatened and blackmailed businesses and industries to create non-existing positions or to provide free products for Negroes.
By the mid 1960s, the official plan or rationale of the federal government was to secretly create an artificial Negro middle class in the hope that such Negroes would have enough invested in racial stability and their own self-interest to at least not be the instigators of future Negro rioting. But to just mandate Negro preferences in government hiring was not enough. The federal government had to force the private sector to hire, promote and even create make-work positions for Negroes.
Obviously this secret agenda of the government to pay blackmail to the Negro would have been very difficult to conceal without the charade of the civil rights movement. The federal government had a huge stake in the civil rights movement succeeding. Most of the so-called debates and legal stands against desegregation and preferential treatment of the Negro were doomed from the start. The die had been cast.
And yet the question still lingers that if right away in the early 1950s the opponents of desegregation had focused their arguments on true Negro anthropology instead of on Constitutional grounds of states' rights, would the courts have been intellectually compelled to decide in their favor despite being pressured otherwise.
Though constantly maligned in the press and in films, the White Southerner understood and cared about the Southern Negro. The South enforced segregation of the races but still considered the Negro as a member of the South, in part as "one of their own". This is in sharp contrast with the hypocritical North. You see, in the South the Southerner did not care for the Negro as a race but fully accepted them as individuals. They were welcomed in Southern homes as nannies for White children, even in segregated eating establishments most of the waiters were Negroes. The exact opposite occurred in the North. The Northerner professed to love the Negroes as a race but disliked and avoided them as individuals. While I lived in Virginia my mother visited me from Connecticut. She was appalled and very upset with Negroes waiting on her in most restaurants. Something, of course, that any Southerner would not give one second's thought to.
Consider that by 1950 the Southern universities seats in anthropology and social sciences had too been infected and swayed by northern equalitarian philosophy. The South instinctively realized the real issue was in the racial limitations of the Negro but it had by then been misled so often that such reason did not exist that the Southerner had almost come to believe it. The same trance that was fogging the North had descended on the South but the South was principled enough to not succumb and destroy its culture.
But unfortunately the South chose to resist the trance of equalitarianism with a counter-illusion based on Constitutional states' rights. The best minds of the South clung to the belief that states' rights was their best defense. Even more damaging, there appeared to be an agenda among Southern politicians and officials that race was to no longer be even mentioned or hinted at. Feverish argument over the validity of the 14th Amendment wasted precious time in both the South and the North, while no one addressed or challenged the root of the whole trouble - the assumption that the Negro was ready and able to be equal in White American society.
The bizarre, self-inflicting cry of "Burn baby, burn" was gleefully shouted as Negroes torched their own neighborhoods, very reminiscent of the senseless destruction that would occur in Africa itself.
The Negro mayhem was stopped on a dime for one reason - Negro blackmail of the United States government.
Using the civil rights movement as a convenient, face-saving cover, the United States guaranteed the Negro leaders preferential treatment in education, housing, employment and subsistence to the Negro race. Barriers to Negro restriction of association with whites such as schools, public transportation, public facilities and the military were to be rapidly and legally removed. Of course this eventually was not enough for certain so-called Negro leaders who threatened and blackmailed businesses and industries to create non-existing positions or to provide free products for Negroes.
By the mid 1960s, the official plan or rationale of the federal government was to secretly create an artificial Negro middle class in the hope that such Negroes would have enough invested in racial stability and their own self-interest to at least not be the instigators of future Negro rioting. But to just mandate Negro preferences in government hiring was not enough. The federal government had to force the private sector to hire, promote and even create make-work positions for Negroes.
Obviously this secret agenda of the government to pay blackmail to the Negro would have been very difficult to conceal without the charade of the civil rights movement. The federal government had a huge stake in the civil rights movement succeeding. Most of the so-called debates and legal stands against desegregation and preferential treatment of the Negro were doomed from the start. The die had been cast.
And yet the question still lingers that if right away in the early 1950s the opponents of desegregation had focused their arguments on true Negro anthropology instead of on Constitutional grounds of states' rights, would the courts have been intellectually compelled to decide in their favor despite being pressured otherwise.
Though constantly maligned in the press and in films, the White Southerner understood and cared about the Southern Negro. The South enforced segregation of the races but still considered the Negro as a member of the South, in part as "one of their own". This is in sharp contrast with the hypocritical North. You see, in the South the Southerner did not care for the Negro as a race but fully accepted them as individuals. They were welcomed in Southern homes as nannies for White children, even in segregated eating establishments most of the waiters were Negroes. The exact opposite occurred in the North. The Northerner professed to love the Negroes as a race but disliked and avoided them as individuals. While I lived in Virginia my mother visited me from Connecticut. She was appalled and very upset with Negroes waiting on her in most restaurants. Something, of course, that any Southerner would not give one second's thought to.
Consider that by 1950 the Southern universities seats in anthropology and social sciences had too been infected and swayed by northern equalitarian philosophy. The South instinctively realized the real issue was in the racial limitations of the Negro but it had by then been misled so often that such reason did not exist that the Southerner had almost come to believe it. The same trance that was fogging the North had descended on the South but the South was principled enough to not succumb and destroy its culture.
But unfortunately the South chose to resist the trance of equalitarianism with a counter-illusion based on Constitutional states' rights. The best minds of the South clung to the belief that states' rights was their best defense. Even more damaging, there appeared to be an agenda among Southern politicians and officials that race was to no longer be even mentioned or hinted at. Feverish argument over the validity of the 14th Amendment wasted precious time in both the South and the North, while no one addressed or challenged the root of the whole trouble - the assumption that the Negro was ready and able to be equal in White American society.
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
The Mirror of Free Societies
Because equlitarians survive only through misrepresentation there is no amazement that they propose that free societies, which they love to call "democracies", can be established and maintained by a snap of their devious finger. They conveniently overlook that it took centuries before any self-sustaining "democracies" worthy of such a name were established. What bizarre process of rationalization and misrepresentation can equalitarians assume and risk that the American Negro, the least intelligent of American races, could be granted equality with these other races by the bang of a gavel?
A stable, free civilization is first and foremost a matter and necessity of individual character in its population. Like any construction of worth, basic procedures must occur. Individual frugality leads to balanced public budgets. Individual self-control leads to public law and order. Individual restraint leads to the rule of reason in governments and juries. Individual self-reliance minimizes the burden of taxation. Individual pride leaves no man with the obligation of sharing the fruits of his labor with the shiftlessness of others.
These are the qualities on which a free society rests. How many currently exist among the average American Negro population?
Even the most die hard equalitarian is forced to admit that it does the community no good to compel a citizen to sacrifice for his neighbor if then the citizen takes his place in destitution. It has been long proven that once you concede to the appetite of certain groups in spending the money of other groups, it becomes almost insatiable. In fact the group demands more and more and will rebel at reducing or stopping the transfer of funds.
Here are the words and opinions written by a writer on African affairs:
"I have yet to meet more than a handful of Africans who wanted to work. There are a few, but so few that they can be considered non-existent. ... There is no desire to succeed here - only an unearned claim for equality with nations that have spent millennia climbing out of barbarism. The African is still in an infantile stage of violence. His answer to any problem is the spear, the club or the witch doctor ... Without white direction and control the African Negro can do nothing. There are no African achievements."
When my son, now 56, was very young he and I joined a father-son group, Indian Guides.
Among the other young boys was a lad who was completely blind. In the often sincere, well-meaning ploys to include the blind boy as much as possible, I was somehow compelled to be irked at these attempts. Not irked in a uncaring way but irked that the other boys in the tribe were subjected and coerced into forfeiting the normal level of their abilities to the lower level of a blind boy. I saw nothing positive being gained by these ploys other than the "feel good" residue left in some fathers.
One meeting it was suggested by some father that the boys on hands and knees form two opposing lines and attempt to see how many could reach their opponents side. The two lines were facing head on to each other. Then the fog of equalitarianism settled in the room because the lights were to be turned off and the scramble performed in total darkness. No need, I hope, to explain why. At that point I pulled my son aside and much to his dismay told him that he would not participate. The lights went out, the scramble began but very quickly the laughter turned into crying as heads met heads. When the lights were turned back on there was a cluster of several boys lying on the floor holding their heads and wailing.
My actions that evening may well seem heartless. The other fathers were only trying to include the blind boy as much as possible. But it proved, to me at least, that nothing is ever gained by leveling down. Frankly I have no answer as to how the level of ability of the blind lad could be raised up in those unique circumstances. But that is not the point. The raw truth was that sighted boys and blind boys were not equal in most situations and never would be. All the well-meaning, "feel good", equalitarian actions denying that were futile, disruptive and doomed to fail.
At present in 2012, political correctness has "encouraged" the group to abandon the word, "Indian", from their name. They are now named some meaningless "Something Guides". At least some progress has been made. And important progress too.
A stable, free civilization is first and foremost a matter and necessity of individual character in its population. Like any construction of worth, basic procedures must occur. Individual frugality leads to balanced public budgets. Individual self-control leads to public law and order. Individual restraint leads to the rule of reason in governments and juries. Individual self-reliance minimizes the burden of taxation. Individual pride leaves no man with the obligation of sharing the fruits of his labor with the shiftlessness of others.
These are the qualities on which a free society rests. How many currently exist among the average American Negro population?
Even the most die hard equalitarian is forced to admit that it does the community no good to compel a citizen to sacrifice for his neighbor if then the citizen takes his place in destitution. It has been long proven that once you concede to the appetite of certain groups in spending the money of other groups, it becomes almost insatiable. In fact the group demands more and more and will rebel at reducing or stopping the transfer of funds.
Here are the words and opinions written by a writer on African affairs:
"I have yet to meet more than a handful of Africans who wanted to work. There are a few, but so few that they can be considered non-existent. ... There is no desire to succeed here - only an unearned claim for equality with nations that have spent millennia climbing out of barbarism. The African is still in an infantile stage of violence. His answer to any problem is the spear, the club or the witch doctor ... Without white direction and control the African Negro can do nothing. There are no African achievements."
When my son, now 56, was very young he and I joined a father-son group, Indian Guides.
Among the other young boys was a lad who was completely blind. In the often sincere, well-meaning ploys to include the blind boy as much as possible, I was somehow compelled to be irked at these attempts. Not irked in a uncaring way but irked that the other boys in the tribe were subjected and coerced into forfeiting the normal level of their abilities to the lower level of a blind boy. I saw nothing positive being gained by these ploys other than the "feel good" residue left in some fathers.
One meeting it was suggested by some father that the boys on hands and knees form two opposing lines and attempt to see how many could reach their opponents side. The two lines were facing head on to each other. Then the fog of equalitarianism settled in the room because the lights were to be turned off and the scramble performed in total darkness. No need, I hope, to explain why. At that point I pulled my son aside and much to his dismay told him that he would not participate. The lights went out, the scramble began but very quickly the laughter turned into crying as heads met heads. When the lights were turned back on there was a cluster of several boys lying on the floor holding their heads and wailing.
My actions that evening may well seem heartless. The other fathers were only trying to include the blind boy as much as possible. But it proved, to me at least, that nothing is ever gained by leveling down. Frankly I have no answer as to how the level of ability of the blind lad could be raised up in those unique circumstances. But that is not the point. The raw truth was that sighted boys and blind boys were not equal in most situations and never would be. All the well-meaning, "feel good", equalitarian actions denying that were futile, disruptive and doomed to fail.
At present in 2012, political correctness has "encouraged" the group to abandon the word, "Indian", from their name. They are now named some meaningless "Something Guides". At least some progress has been made. And important progress too.
Equalitarian Indoctrination
I have tried to be extremely cognizant and respectful of the sincere mindset of readers now two generations younger than I am because they are the educational product of equalitarian dominance. But I am also concerned about their rigid intolerance toward and censoring of any other point of view (or fact) other than the equalitarian. I have concluded that such closed mindedness as to racial equality borders on mind control. These two generations received their education during the deepest point of equalitarian hypnosis. A trance-like hypnosis that purposely generated closed mindness be it as to race or in other fields. Their constant accusation of intolerance in any one challenging their unyielding point of view rang pitifully hollow when the intolerance was so obviously emanating from their equalitarian side. They were not really concerned about intolerance, they were frightened by the weakness and absurdity of their racial point of view. The equalitarian indoctrination was not powerful enough to eradicate all common sense but it successfully dinned into them fraudulent theories that their adult minds protected at any cost. This is far different from normal contention between generations. This close mindedness is one of the most serious problems facing this country. It took over a decade to eradicate the belief in Nazism in post-war Germany. Such mind control is called indoctrination for a very good reason.
Liberalism once meant the desire to improve the condition of mankind by creating an inspirational setting. The true liberal knew that the challenges of life creates inequalities. He conceded that one cannot have excellence unless someone or something excels. The true liberal was cognizant that humans only grow through effort, indeed spiritual, moral and intellectual effort.
The equalitarian is well aware of these things also but he shuns challenge and envies excellence. He envies the excellence he either cannot achieve or will not exert the effort of achieving. His mindset forces him to destroy avenues to excellence. The equalitarian ignites such envy in others as such contrived envy is his life's blood. He strives to convince others that success and excellence are expressions of injustice to themselves. But most of all, he worships mediocrity. Every motive revolves around leveling down, never raising up. He knows that he must first destroy then rebuild the spiritual, the moral and the intellectual. Rebuild in a setting favorable to mediocrity.
But in the attempt to indoctrinate racial attitudes, the equalitarian flounders. Despite the intensity of indoctrination, despite the depth of the trance the American people are still vaguely aware of how untenable are their positions on race and the obvious contradictions to such positions. But, and a big "but", the total indoctrination is so powerful that the people can only muddle on, forced to rationalize and defend the incredulous. Snared in endless obvious contradictions, present day equalitarian stooges can only lash out at detractors or escape from them with ridicule or personal attacks. One moment of unbiased reflection should convince them that their precious cause is not granting human rights to the Negro but stealing them from the white citizens, from themselves. They have become useful idiots in the destruction of their own civilization.
Liberalism once meant the desire to improve the condition of mankind by creating an inspirational setting. The true liberal knew that the challenges of life creates inequalities. He conceded that one cannot have excellence unless someone or something excels. The true liberal was cognizant that humans only grow through effort, indeed spiritual, moral and intellectual effort.
The equalitarian is well aware of these things also but he shuns challenge and envies excellence. He envies the excellence he either cannot achieve or will not exert the effort of achieving. His mindset forces him to destroy avenues to excellence. The equalitarian ignites such envy in others as such contrived envy is his life's blood. He strives to convince others that success and excellence are expressions of injustice to themselves. But most of all, he worships mediocrity. Every motive revolves around leveling down, never raising up. He knows that he must first destroy then rebuild the spiritual, the moral and the intellectual. Rebuild in a setting favorable to mediocrity.
But in the attempt to indoctrinate racial attitudes, the equalitarian flounders. Despite the intensity of indoctrination, despite the depth of the trance the American people are still vaguely aware of how untenable are their positions on race and the obvious contradictions to such positions. But, and a big "but", the total indoctrination is so powerful that the people can only muddle on, forced to rationalize and defend the incredulous. Snared in endless obvious contradictions, present day equalitarian stooges can only lash out at detractors or escape from them with ridicule or personal attacks. One moment of unbiased reflection should convince them that their precious cause is not granting human rights to the Negro but stealing them from the white citizens, from themselves. They have become useful idiots in the destruction of their own civilization.
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
The Battleground of Thought
The true conflict in America is the same in 2012 as in 1960. It is a struggle between socialist equalitarianism on one side and individual freedom and responsibility on the other. In the first system is the belief that benefits should come from the State. In the second system that benefits should be obtained from individual effort.
I assume the reader knows what individual effort means but what really is "the State"? To begin, "the State" is a purely theoretical concept which exists only in the mind. It is no more than a name which individuals give to a method they use for working together to achieve certain objectives. The only material reality is the individual. Thus whenever one hears talk of dependence on "the State", it actually means some individuals depending on other individuals. The prevalent idea that "the State" is an entity that can be leaned on is just one of the stupidities one must expect from equalitarianism. The only entity of consciousness is the individual, "the State" can never qualify in that respect. Communism seeks to warp the reality of the individual into its exact opposite by confusing the minds of the exploited. The granting of unearned rights to some individuals is in reality stealing them from others. All rights must be limited by the rights of others. The greatest of all human rights is the right of a race to protect its culture from deterioration.
I assume the reader knows what individual effort means but what really is "the State"? To begin, "the State" is a purely theoretical concept which exists only in the mind. It is no more than a name which individuals give to a method they use for working together to achieve certain objectives. The only material reality is the individual. Thus whenever one hears talk of dependence on "the State", it actually means some individuals depending on other individuals. The prevalent idea that "the State" is an entity that can be leaned on is just one of the stupidities one must expect from equalitarianism. The only entity of consciousness is the individual, "the State" can never qualify in that respect. Communism seeks to warp the reality of the individual into its exact opposite by confusing the minds of the exploited. The granting of unearned rights to some individuals is in reality stealing them from others. All rights must be limited by the rights of others. The greatest of all human rights is the right of a race to protect its culture from deterioration.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)