There is no such thing as an old joke. Someone, somewhere has never heard it.
It is never a waste of time to restate the truth. Many will hear it for the first time.
The following states the core truth about the present Democrat Party:
The Democrat Party is the anti-White party.
Its long term goal is to flood White areas with non-White immigrants.
Enfranchise as many non-White voters as possible.
Raise taxes and expand the size of government in order to destroy
White freedom.
Redistribute the wealth of White people to non-White racial voting blocs.
Its desired goal is endless power and control.
Thursday, June 21, 2012
Friday, May 11, 2012
Watermelon Jive
Obama must be legally removed from his illegal role as president before the 2012 election or at least so uncovered and disgraced that he never could be elected despite all the criminal election fraud that will occur.
Otherwise, Obama will win the 2012 presidential election by a huge landslide.
Present polls taken 5 months before election are utterly worthless and misleading, and intentionally so. They only reflect wishful thinking and outright deception by those projected votes for a Mitt Romney or a Newt Gingrich. And these distorted polls are gleefully reported by a complicit main stream press.
Past voting analysis has revealed that a very large number of voters assumed to be conservative Republicans have in fact voted for a Democrat administration. This in spite of the obvious destruction of the religious, moral, and fiscal model they profess to support.
The brutal and uncompromising reality for today and the near future is that only about six percent of declared Republicans now believe and follow the tenets of staunch conservatism. Locally others may vote solid Republican but for national leadership and policy they succumb to personal freedom from the rigid moral standards of mid-20th century America.
With declared Republican enthusiasm very weak for Romney, the supposed "shoo-in" candidate; blacks voting en bloc for any Negro; Hispanics believing Obama is the only route to full amnesty for past illegal immigration; and elite liberals still mesmerized by "the chameleon Negro", plus predicted low voter turnout as so far, no wonder Obama is constantly flashing his "I'se do luv watermelon" smile.
Otherwise, Obama will win the 2012 presidential election by a huge landslide.
Present polls taken 5 months before election are utterly worthless and misleading, and intentionally so. They only reflect wishful thinking and outright deception by those projected votes for a Mitt Romney or a Newt Gingrich. And these distorted polls are gleefully reported by a complicit main stream press.
Past voting analysis has revealed that a very large number of voters assumed to be conservative Republicans have in fact voted for a Democrat administration. This in spite of the obvious destruction of the religious, moral, and fiscal model they profess to support.
The brutal and uncompromising reality for today and the near future is that only about six percent of declared Republicans now believe and follow the tenets of staunch conservatism. Locally others may vote solid Republican but for national leadership and policy they succumb to personal freedom from the rigid moral standards of mid-20th century America.
With declared Republican enthusiasm very weak for Romney, the supposed "shoo-in" candidate; blacks voting en bloc for any Negro; Hispanics believing Obama is the only route to full amnesty for past illegal immigration; and elite liberals still mesmerized by "the chameleon Negro", plus predicted low voter turnout as so far, no wonder Obama is constantly flashing his "I'se do luv watermelon" smile.
Friday, February 17, 2012
Was It Obama .... or Else?
Barack Hussein Obama II has been proven by all pre-existing legal criteria and precedent to be ineligible to run for the Office of Presidency of the USA; Obama since illegally in this office has acted in every major decision against the interests of the USA; every sitting congressman, senator, court justice, CIA, FBI are fully aware that Obama is an ineligible, unqualified, even traitorous impostor.
Why is Obama not only still in office but will win certain re-election in November 2012?
That puzzling question can be answered by another puzzling question.
Why has there been no further terrorist attacks on the US mainland since September 11, 2001?
One very plausible explanation is that the United States government has been coerced into a undisclosed treaty with the militant Muslims to allow a Muslim to be elected the President of the USA in exchange for a full moratorium on any further terrorist attacks on America. Attacks upon the major cities, airports, national monuments, the Golden State Bridge, the Statue of Liberty and the White House itself which would cause untold civilian deaths and complete breakdown of American society.
This would explain the apparent cowardice of responsible members of government, of the press and of the media to almost frantically deny or ridicule any surfacing of the true facts about Obama and his parentage and education. They were not silent to protect their careers, they were terrified into silence to protect their lives.
This siege now being waged against America and American interests abroad has succeeded beyond any other take over of one nation by its sworn enemies. This enemy is Islamic. Its current leader is Iran. Its financial backer is Saudi Arabia. It now has its own trained and sponsored Muslim leader in Barack Hussein Obama II, the President of the USA ....... for life. Obama is a devious plant to slowly but surely prepare the American mind and will to Islamic laws and barbaric customs. Obama cannot be impeached, accused or removed from office without the risks of America being destroyed by Iranian sleeper terrorists already within its borders.
And this Islamic threat is far removed from, perhaps totally unaware of, the existing movement to obliterate not only Western values and religions but all religions on earth.
Why is Obama not only still in office but will win certain re-election in November 2012?
That puzzling question can be answered by another puzzling question.
Why has there been no further terrorist attacks on the US mainland since September 11, 2001?
One very plausible explanation is that the United States government has been coerced into a undisclosed treaty with the militant Muslims to allow a Muslim to be elected the President of the USA in exchange for a full moratorium on any further terrorist attacks on America. Attacks upon the major cities, airports, national monuments, the Golden State Bridge, the Statue of Liberty and the White House itself which would cause untold civilian deaths and complete breakdown of American society.
This would explain the apparent cowardice of responsible members of government, of the press and of the media to almost frantically deny or ridicule any surfacing of the true facts about Obama and his parentage and education. They were not silent to protect their careers, they were terrified into silence to protect their lives.
This siege now being waged against America and American interests abroad has succeeded beyond any other take over of one nation by its sworn enemies. This enemy is Islamic. Its current leader is Iran. Its financial backer is Saudi Arabia. It now has its own trained and sponsored Muslim leader in Barack Hussein Obama II, the President of the USA ....... for life. Obama is a devious plant to slowly but surely prepare the American mind and will to Islamic laws and barbaric customs. Obama cannot be impeached, accused or removed from office without the risks of America being destroyed by Iranian sleeper terrorists already within its borders.
And this Islamic threat is far removed from, perhaps totally unaware of, the existing movement to obliterate not only Western values and religions but all religions on earth.
Thursday, February 16, 2012
The 1917 Houston Rioting
In Spring 1917, the US War Department ordered two US Army military installations to be built in Harris County, Texas. These were Camp Logan and Ellington Field. The bases were initially to house and train soldiers from the Illinois National Guard and were very close to Houston.
On July 27, 1917 the all-Negro 3rd Battalion, 24th Infantry Regiment traveled by train to Houston from Camp Columbus, New Mexico accompanied by 7 White officers. The 24th had previously been stationed in the Philippines. There was extreme racial segregation in Texas and the wearing of an US Army uniform meant absolutely nothing different in being treated as a Negro. One Negro soldier was shot and killed for just wearing that army uniform. Both military and civilian coloureds were referred to as "niggers".
About noontime on August 23, 1917, in Houston's Fourth Ward, the Houston Police while searching for someone else were required to further take into custody an uncooperative Negress in the home. This woman was intoxicated and physically resisted the police until finally the arrest had to be made outside on the street.
A Negro soldier from the 24th interfered and was immediately beaten to the ground, arrested and jailed.
That afternoon of August 23rd, a Negro military police corporal, Charles Baltimore, went to the Houston Police Station to investigate the incident of earlier that day but to also to try to release another soldier who was in jail for an entirely separate charge. Soon heated arguments turned to violence resulting in Corporal Baltimore being beaten and arrested himself. However, Baltimore was soon released.
In the dark, rainy evening of August 23rd, 156 Negro soldiers disobeyed officers' orders, stole weapons from the camp depot and marched on the city of Houston. It appears that the main instigator was a Negro sergeant, Vida Henry, of I Company. These rioters were met outside of Houston by the Houston Police and a large force of armed civilians. A virtual race riot ensued in which 4 Negro soldiers, 4 Houston Police and 12 citizens were killed. Also killed was a Captain Joseph Mattes of the Illinois National Guard. The instigator, Sgt Henry, shot and killed himself.
On August 24, 1917 order was restored around Houston, all Negro soldiers disarmed and the 3rd Battalion sent by rail back to New Mexico
The deaths of so many civilians and the long held fear of arming Negro military resulted in not one but three court martials to finally satisfy the US military.
Present at the first court martial were 3 Brigadier Generals, 7 full Colonels, 3 Lt Colonels. Of the officers eight were graduates of West Point. On December 6, 1917, 13 Negro soldiers including Corporal Baltimore were sentenced to be hanged for murder, 41 Negros were given life sentences.
On December 11 1917, on over-night built gallows, the 13 accused murderers were hanged simultaneously at 07:17 AM. Only Army and county personnel were allowed to witness the executions.
The second court martial (known as the Washington case) took place 6 days later in which 15 Negroes of the lower A Division were tried. Five given the death sentence.
At the third court martial (known as the Tillman case) on March 26 1918, 40 more Negro soldiers were charged; 11 sentenced to death; the others to life imprisonment.
On May 2 1918, General John Ruckman formally approved and sanctioned all sentences.
On July 27, 1917 the all-Negro 3rd Battalion, 24th Infantry Regiment traveled by train to Houston from Camp Columbus, New Mexico accompanied by 7 White officers. The 24th had previously been stationed in the Philippines. There was extreme racial segregation in Texas and the wearing of an US Army uniform meant absolutely nothing different in being treated as a Negro. One Negro soldier was shot and killed for just wearing that army uniform. Both military and civilian coloureds were referred to as "niggers".
About noontime on August 23, 1917, in Houston's Fourth Ward, the Houston Police while searching for someone else were required to further take into custody an uncooperative Negress in the home. This woman was intoxicated and physically resisted the police until finally the arrest had to be made outside on the street.
A Negro soldier from the 24th interfered and was immediately beaten to the ground, arrested and jailed.
That afternoon of August 23rd, a Negro military police corporal, Charles Baltimore, went to the Houston Police Station to investigate the incident of earlier that day but to also to try to release another soldier who was in jail for an entirely separate charge. Soon heated arguments turned to violence resulting in Corporal Baltimore being beaten and arrested himself. However, Baltimore was soon released.
In the dark, rainy evening of August 23rd, 156 Negro soldiers disobeyed officers' orders, stole weapons from the camp depot and marched on the city of Houston. It appears that the main instigator was a Negro sergeant, Vida Henry, of I Company. These rioters were met outside of Houston by the Houston Police and a large force of armed civilians. A virtual race riot ensued in which 4 Negro soldiers, 4 Houston Police and 12 citizens were killed. Also killed was a Captain Joseph Mattes of the Illinois National Guard. The instigator, Sgt Henry, shot and killed himself.
On August 24, 1917 order was restored around Houston, all Negro soldiers disarmed and the 3rd Battalion sent by rail back to New Mexico
The deaths of so many civilians and the long held fear of arming Negro military resulted in not one but three court martials to finally satisfy the US military.
Present at the first court martial were 3 Brigadier Generals, 7 full Colonels, 3 Lt Colonels. Of the officers eight were graduates of West Point. On December 6, 1917, 13 Negro soldiers including Corporal Baltimore were sentenced to be hanged for murder, 41 Negros were given life sentences.
On December 11 1917, on over-night built gallows, the 13 accused murderers were hanged simultaneously at 07:17 AM. Only Army and county personnel were allowed to witness the executions.
The second court martial (known as the Washington case) took place 6 days later in which 15 Negroes of the lower A Division were tried. Five given the death sentence.
At the third court martial (known as the Tillman case) on March 26 1918, 40 more Negro soldiers were charged; 11 sentenced to death; the others to life imprisonment.
On May 2 1918, General John Ruckman formally approved and sanctioned all sentences.
Sunday, February 12, 2012
Cut to the Core
To those who chide about my persistence in discussing the Negro race dilemma in America today in 2012, after a half century of so-called "settled" opinions contrary to my views, I stubbornly answer, "no sound and permanent solution to any problem was ever finally found without going to the original core of it.". False conclusions stacked upon years of other false conclusions prove nothing toward the validity or soundness of the original problem. A train mistakenly switched onto one track will remain on that course until it is somehow reversed or shunted to the correct track no matter how much time elapsed or how sure the engineer thought he was proceeding correctly.
The heart and core of the major problem with race in America lies in establishing the valid answer to one debated question of anthropology. Are the proven limitations of the Negro the sole result of his bad environment or is his proven bad environment the result of his innate limitations? Can any and every effort to change or improve the Negro's surroundings and education ever reach the root cause of his comparatively inferior performance OR is such inferior performance strictly a matter of innate racial differences?
From 1930 on, every public decision or policy concerning the Negro race should have been decided on the proper answer to the question above: innate racial differences. Consider and consider very objectively the bottomless predicament this nation faced yesterday, faces today and will face tomorrow because we were duped on to the wrong track, we allowed every public program, related law and an obscene political correctness to be enacted under the erroneous hypothesis of "the environment". And to repeat, in spite of all the then existing evidence proving that hypothesis to be WRONG.
What is more important and vital is informing Americans that they are marching off a cliff because of an environmental hypothesis of pure ILLUSION and to STOP, REFLECT, then commence to form racial policies based upon REALITY. As controversial and counter the status-quo as it will be, there is no other way to a permanent solution to the racial divide. Otherwise, very bluntly the White American culture and way of life will be destroyed by hordes of violent, anti-white, savages identical in innate behavior as in South Africa, Rhodesia, Kenya, Uganda in fact in all of the imposition of "Africa for the Africans".
When I was an outside investigator and collector for credit companies and even if the city was unfamiliar to me, when given the general location I would find the Negro neighborhoods by merely approaching them. I would know that 99% of the day's calls were going to be on the streets right there. This was not the case with the rare calls I was assigned in other poor sections of the city because these were White neighborhoods with somewhat of a pride in their appearance. In a large city or small town, the Negro neighborhoods were the same - trash-strewn, broken glass, empty buildings and guys hanging around. One city project built with much fanfare for poor Negroes was Elmhaven in New Haven CT. A year later it was an utterly vandalized and destroyed building complex. Even the heavy cement seats bolted down for outside sitting were gone.
The mail boxes in the entry were smashed, doors ripped off and spray-painted all over the names.
The elevator was designed to only stop at even numbered floors so if one wanted to go to floor 5, he would go to floor 6 and walk down the stairwell to floor 5. Whenever I was forced to enter the closed stairwell, I would brace myself, take a deep breath, then bolt down the stairs as fast as I could. The stench of orange peels mixed with garbage and who knows what in that stairwell could sicken a hog. At the bottom of the stairs were piles of garbage, debris and anything that could be indifferently thrown down there. Remember people still lived there, this was their home. This was the way Negroes lived. And I suspect that those types of government provided and subsidized housing developments are the same today or worse.
My experiences were in 1953, the crucial debate over Negro rights was going on. Did any liberal, equalitarian, pompous proponent of forced mixing of White and Negroes ever dare to witness the thousand examples like Elmhaven in New Haven alone? Have any useful idiots of that insane era ever admitted their errors?
"Repetition does not transform a lie into a truth." - Franklin Delano Roosevelt
The heart and core of the major problem with race in America lies in establishing the valid answer to one debated question of anthropology. Are the proven limitations of the Negro the sole result of his bad environment or is his proven bad environment the result of his innate limitations? Can any and every effort to change or improve the Negro's surroundings and education ever reach the root cause of his comparatively inferior performance OR is such inferior performance strictly a matter of innate racial differences?
From 1930 on, every public decision or policy concerning the Negro race should have been decided on the proper answer to the question above: innate racial differences. Consider and consider very objectively the bottomless predicament this nation faced yesterday, faces today and will face tomorrow because we were duped on to the wrong track, we allowed every public program, related law and an obscene political correctness to be enacted under the erroneous hypothesis of "the environment". And to repeat, in spite of all the then existing evidence proving that hypothesis to be WRONG.
What is more important and vital is informing Americans that they are marching off a cliff because of an environmental hypothesis of pure ILLUSION and to STOP, REFLECT, then commence to form racial policies based upon REALITY. As controversial and counter the status-quo as it will be, there is no other way to a permanent solution to the racial divide. Otherwise, very bluntly the White American culture and way of life will be destroyed by hordes of violent, anti-white, savages identical in innate behavior as in South Africa, Rhodesia, Kenya, Uganda in fact in all of the imposition of "Africa for the Africans".
When I was an outside investigator and collector for credit companies and even if the city was unfamiliar to me, when given the general location I would find the Negro neighborhoods by merely approaching them. I would know that 99% of the day's calls were going to be on the streets right there. This was not the case with the rare calls I was assigned in other poor sections of the city because these were White neighborhoods with somewhat of a pride in their appearance. In a large city or small town, the Negro neighborhoods were the same - trash-strewn, broken glass, empty buildings and guys hanging around. One city project built with much fanfare for poor Negroes was Elmhaven in New Haven CT. A year later it was an utterly vandalized and destroyed building complex. Even the heavy cement seats bolted down for outside sitting were gone.
The mail boxes in the entry were smashed, doors ripped off and spray-painted all over the names.
The elevator was designed to only stop at even numbered floors so if one wanted to go to floor 5, he would go to floor 6 and walk down the stairwell to floor 5. Whenever I was forced to enter the closed stairwell, I would brace myself, take a deep breath, then bolt down the stairs as fast as I could. The stench of orange peels mixed with garbage and who knows what in that stairwell could sicken a hog. At the bottom of the stairs were piles of garbage, debris and anything that could be indifferently thrown down there. Remember people still lived there, this was their home. This was the way Negroes lived. And I suspect that those types of government provided and subsidized housing developments are the same today or worse.
My experiences were in 1953, the crucial debate over Negro rights was going on. Did any liberal, equalitarian, pompous proponent of forced mixing of White and Negroes ever dare to witness the thousand examples like Elmhaven in New Haven alone? Have any useful idiots of that insane era ever admitted their errors?
"Repetition does not transform a lie into a truth." - Franklin Delano Roosevelt
Saturday, February 11, 2012
Incidents of Insurrection
During World War II, Townsville, Queensland, Australia was a crucial base for American and Australian campaigns in the Pacific, including the Battle of the Coral Sea. It remains an Australian military base today.
Though never reported to or by the American press, in May 1942 Townsville was also the site of one of the biggest troop uprising within the US military. The shootings and rioting were by American Negro soldiers.
And it was not the first or last such racial and armed conflict in Australia.
In April 1942 a large contingent of American Negro troops arrived in Townsville. These Negroes had been trained very minimally in military discipline or behavior. They were basically American laborers brought in to help build airfields around Townsville. As per strict US military order, all officers were White, although there were Negro non-commissioned officers. Negro troops were very rarely committed to actual combat. These soldiers were from the 96th Battalion, US Army Corps of Engineers and were stationed at a base on the western outskirts of Townsville. This base was known as "Kelso".
Shortly after arrival, 100 Negro troops created a racial conflict near their base and had to be rounded up by the US Marines using bayonets and loaded rifles.
In May 1942, racial tensions between the White officers and Negro troops escalated to the point where several Negro ringleaders decided to machine gun the tents of the White officers. Thousands of rounds were fired, the White officers returned fire and estimates up to 19 personnel were killed and dozens more seriously wounded. Negro soldiers rampaged from the camp, terrorizing surrounding Australian homes and at least one rape was reported. The overall siege lasted over 8 hours.
Fully armed Australian troops along with the Queensland Police and the Townsville Police were called in to roadblock the rioters from entering the city. The official accounts of these incidents are still in police archives.
The violence was subdued and many of the Negro rioters packed off to New Guinea.
Though kept completely secret by the Roosevelt administration, the whole affair was severe enough that in 1942, US Congressman Lyndon B. Johnson went to Australia and spent 3 days in Townsville. Johnson was given and examined official US and Australian military accounts of the Negro rioting and also the eyewitness report of a US journalist who was stationed at Kelso. But despite this, the rebellion was never reported by the US press but instead filed away in the national archives. President Roosevelt did not want any details of this racial incident to ever come out and, in fact, in 1943 Eleanor Roosevelt herself was dispatched to visit a newly established "Negro Only" service club in Townsville.
There were about 10,000 American Negro servicemen sent to Australia during the war. Australia had a very strict racial segregation. In 1942 there were also other clashes involving Negro GIs at Torrens Creek, Ingham, and Mt Isa, in Australia.
Later in 1944 in another part of the Pacific there was one of the most serious racial incident between Negro navy personnel and US Marines.
In July 1944 the 3rd Marine Division retook Guam from the Japanese at the cost of 1,600 Marine lives. Guam was turned into a base for allied operations. Five large airfields were constructed by the SeaBeas. B-29 super bombers could fly as far a mainland Japan.
In late August 1944, just a few weeks after already battle worn Marines had been exposed to the most vicious fighting and hand-to-hand combat with Japanese defenders, the all Negro 25th Depot Company of the US Navy started landing operations at the Naval Supply Depot. There sparked immediate tensions and minor incidents between the White Marines and the Negro naval personnel.
On Christmas Eve 1944, nine Negro Marines from the 25th Depot Company were on pass and went into Agana. There was a confrontation between the Negroes and White Marines, supposedly shots were fired at the Negroes who were forced to flee back to the base. Eight were OK, one Negro Marine was missing.
In re-action, 40 Negro enlisted men piled into two trucks and started off toward Agana to find the missing man. However the MPs in Agana were informed and the MPs proceeded to erect barricades across all roads leading into Agana. The two trucks were stopped, there was a brief standoff but when the Negroes were told that the missing man had been found and was OK, they returned to their base.
On Christmas Day 1944, a Negro enlisted man walking back to camp from Agana was shot dead by two White Marines. Shortly thereafter another Negro enlisted man was shot and killed in Agana.
On December 26 1944, a vehicle driven by White Marines opened gunfire on the Negro depot. Camp guards returned fire and a White officer was wounded. The vehicle fled toward Agana; behind them a number of armed Negro personnel. All vehicles were stopped by White MPs at a roadblock outside of Agana. All participants White or Negro were arrested and charged with attempted murder, rioting, unlawful assembly, and theft of government property.
At the Court of Inquiry, 45 Negro military personnel were court martialed and sent to prison.
Though never reported to or by the American press, in May 1942 Townsville was also the site of one of the biggest troop uprising within the US military. The shootings and rioting were by American Negro soldiers.
And it was not the first or last such racial and armed conflict in Australia.
In April 1942 a large contingent of American Negro troops arrived in Townsville. These Negroes had been trained very minimally in military discipline or behavior. They were basically American laborers brought in to help build airfields around Townsville. As per strict US military order, all officers were White, although there were Negro non-commissioned officers. Negro troops were very rarely committed to actual combat. These soldiers were from the 96th Battalion, US Army Corps of Engineers and were stationed at a base on the western outskirts of Townsville. This base was known as "Kelso".
Shortly after arrival, 100 Negro troops created a racial conflict near their base and had to be rounded up by the US Marines using bayonets and loaded rifles.
In May 1942, racial tensions between the White officers and Negro troops escalated to the point where several Negro ringleaders decided to machine gun the tents of the White officers. Thousands of rounds were fired, the White officers returned fire and estimates up to 19 personnel were killed and dozens more seriously wounded. Negro soldiers rampaged from the camp, terrorizing surrounding Australian homes and at least one rape was reported. The overall siege lasted over 8 hours.
Fully armed Australian troops along with the Queensland Police and the Townsville Police were called in to roadblock the rioters from entering the city. The official accounts of these incidents are still in police archives.
The violence was subdued and many of the Negro rioters packed off to New Guinea.
Though kept completely secret by the Roosevelt administration, the whole affair was severe enough that in 1942, US Congressman Lyndon B. Johnson went to Australia and spent 3 days in Townsville. Johnson was given and examined official US and Australian military accounts of the Negro rioting and also the eyewitness report of a US journalist who was stationed at Kelso. But despite this, the rebellion was never reported by the US press but instead filed away in the national archives. President Roosevelt did not want any details of this racial incident to ever come out and, in fact, in 1943 Eleanor Roosevelt herself was dispatched to visit a newly established "Negro Only" service club in Townsville.
There were about 10,000 American Negro servicemen sent to Australia during the war. Australia had a very strict racial segregation. In 1942 there were also other clashes involving Negro GIs at Torrens Creek, Ingham, and Mt Isa, in Australia.
Later in 1944 in another part of the Pacific there was one of the most serious racial incident between Negro navy personnel and US Marines.
In July 1944 the 3rd Marine Division retook Guam from the Japanese at the cost of 1,600 Marine lives. Guam was turned into a base for allied operations. Five large airfields were constructed by the SeaBeas. B-29 super bombers could fly as far a mainland Japan.
In late August 1944, just a few weeks after already battle worn Marines had been exposed to the most vicious fighting and hand-to-hand combat with Japanese defenders, the all Negro 25th Depot Company of the US Navy started landing operations at the Naval Supply Depot. There sparked immediate tensions and minor incidents between the White Marines and the Negro naval personnel.
On Christmas Eve 1944, nine Negro Marines from the 25th Depot Company were on pass and went into Agana. There was a confrontation between the Negroes and White Marines, supposedly shots were fired at the Negroes who were forced to flee back to the base. Eight were OK, one Negro Marine was missing.
In re-action, 40 Negro enlisted men piled into two trucks and started off toward Agana to find the missing man. However the MPs in Agana were informed and the MPs proceeded to erect barricades across all roads leading into Agana. The two trucks were stopped, there was a brief standoff but when the Negroes were told that the missing man had been found and was OK, they returned to their base.
On Christmas Day 1944, a Negro enlisted man walking back to camp from Agana was shot dead by two White Marines. Shortly thereafter another Negro enlisted man was shot and killed in Agana.
On December 26 1944, a vehicle driven by White Marines opened gunfire on the Negro depot. Camp guards returned fire and a White officer was wounded. The vehicle fled toward Agana; behind them a number of armed Negro personnel. All vehicles were stopped by White MPs at a roadblock outside of Agana. All participants White or Negro were arrested and charged with attempted murder, rioting, unlawful assembly, and theft of government property.
At the Court of Inquiry, 45 Negro military personnel were court martialed and sent to prison.
Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Remember Rhodesia
Is the past our future? The lesson of Southern Rhodesia.
In 1980, a flourishing, stable, free, democratic republic was murdered and hung out to decay by Great Britain, the United States and the West in the equalitarian name of "anti-racism" and "African-democracy". This civilization was once the proud British colony of Rhodesia.
On November 11, 1965 Southern Rhodesia, which had experienced the highest casualty count of any of the British colonies in World War II, faced with the terrifying prospect of Negro majority rule, unilaterally declared independence from the British Empire. The Rhodesians were determined to avoid the disaster of a "one man, one vote" Negro majority rule.
Rhodesia had been denied independence because of the politically correct "NIMBAR policy" of Great Britain. This unjust policy was enforced by Prime Minister, Harold Wilson, and utterly discounted the proven success or stability of a colony and instead evaluated its commitment to universal manhood sufferage. NIMBAR stood for "No Independence Before African Rule".
After self-declared independence, Rhodesia faced endless economic sanctions imposed by the United Nations in the utopian aim to topple the new government of Ian Smith. Ian Smith had been an ace pilot for the Royal Air Force in World War II and was the duly elected leader of the Rhodesians. No foreign government, including the United States, recognized the new Rhodesia or welcomed it into the family of free republics.
But Rhodesia was not defeated. It carried on honorably and successfully until about 1975 when South Africa withdrew its support and Marxist (Negro) terrorists renewed guerrilla war against Rhodesia. When Angola and Mozambique fell to Marxist majority rule, the United States under Secretary of State Henry Kissinger increased its pressure on Rhodesia to accept majority Negro rule.
In 1980, the freed, Marxist terrorist prisoner, Robert Mugabe, became the President of the Republic of Zimbabwe, once Rhodesia, through African-style "democratic" elections. Under Mugabe's tyrannical and erratic rule Zimbabwe became a culture being murdered one White farm family at a time. The murder weapon being the West's own suicidal, liberal ideology applied to a totally unsuitable Negro racial context.
The lesson from the world's treatment of Rhodesia is this:
Political inclusion of Negroes in a liberal democracy inevitably transforms a society from a promised multi-racial utopia into a barbaric democracy; rule by the long knife. This is now demonstrated in Zimbabwe, a nation in poverty, where Negroes are 98.5 percent of the population.
In 1980, a flourishing, stable, free, democratic republic was murdered and hung out to decay by Great Britain, the United States and the West in the equalitarian name of "anti-racism" and "African-democracy". This civilization was once the proud British colony of Rhodesia.
On November 11, 1965 Southern Rhodesia, which had experienced the highest casualty count of any of the British colonies in World War II, faced with the terrifying prospect of Negro majority rule, unilaterally declared independence from the British Empire. The Rhodesians were determined to avoid the disaster of a "one man, one vote" Negro majority rule.
Rhodesia had been denied independence because of the politically correct "NIMBAR policy" of Great Britain. This unjust policy was enforced by Prime Minister, Harold Wilson, and utterly discounted the proven success or stability of a colony and instead evaluated its commitment to universal manhood sufferage. NIMBAR stood for "No Independence Before African Rule".
After self-declared independence, Rhodesia faced endless economic sanctions imposed by the United Nations in the utopian aim to topple the new government of Ian Smith. Ian Smith had been an ace pilot for the Royal Air Force in World War II and was the duly elected leader of the Rhodesians. No foreign government, including the United States, recognized the new Rhodesia or welcomed it into the family of free republics.
But Rhodesia was not defeated. It carried on honorably and successfully until about 1975 when South Africa withdrew its support and Marxist (Negro) terrorists renewed guerrilla war against Rhodesia. When Angola and Mozambique fell to Marxist majority rule, the United States under Secretary of State Henry Kissinger increased its pressure on Rhodesia to accept majority Negro rule.
In 1980, the freed, Marxist terrorist prisoner, Robert Mugabe, became the President of the Republic of Zimbabwe, once Rhodesia, through African-style "democratic" elections. Under Mugabe's tyrannical and erratic rule Zimbabwe became a culture being murdered one White farm family at a time. The murder weapon being the West's own suicidal, liberal ideology applied to a totally unsuitable Negro racial context.
The lesson from the world's treatment of Rhodesia is this:
Political inclusion of Negroes in a liberal democracy inevitably transforms a society from a promised multi-racial utopia into a barbaric democracy; rule by the long knife. This is now demonstrated in Zimbabwe, a nation in poverty, where Negroes are 98.5 percent of the population.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)