Democrats are not joking

There is no such thing as an old joke. Someone, somewhere has never heard it.

It is never a waste of time to restate the truth. Many will hear it for the first time.

The following states the core truth about the present Democrat Party:

The Democrat Party is the anti-White party.

Its long term goal is to flood White areas with non-White immigrants.

Enfranchise as many non-White voters as possible.

Raise taxes and expand the size of government in order to destroy
White freedom.

Redistribute the wealth of White people to non-White racial voting blocs.

Its desired goal is endless power and control.

Watermelon Jive

Obama must be legally removed from his illegal role as president before the 2012 election or at least so uncovered and disgraced that he never could be elected despite all the criminal election fraud that will occur.

Otherwise, Obama will win the 2012 presidential election by a huge landslide.

Present polls taken 5 months before election are utterly worthless and misleading, and intentionally so. They only reflect wishful thinking and outright deception by those projected votes for a Mitt Romney or a Newt Gingrich. And these distorted polls are gleefully reported by a complicit main stream press.

Past voting analysis has revealed that a very large number of voters assumed to be conservative Republicans have in fact voted for a Democrat administration. This in spite of the obvious destruction of the religious, moral, and fiscal model they profess to support.

The brutal and uncompromising reality for today and the near future is that only about six percent of declared Republicans now believe and follow the tenets of staunch conservatism. Locally others may vote solid Republican but for national leadership and policy they succumb to personal freedom from the rigid moral standards of mid-20th century America.    

With declared Republican enthusiasm very weak for Romney, the supposed "shoo-in" candidate; blacks voting en bloc for any Negro; Hispanics believing Obama is the only route to full amnesty for past illegal immigration; and elite liberals still mesmerized by "the chameleon Negro", plus predicted low voter turnout as so far, no wonder Obama is constantly flashing his "I'se do luv watermelon" smile.
   

Was It Obama .... or Else?

Barack Hussein Obama II has been proven by all pre-existing legal criteria and precedent to be ineligible to run for the Office of Presidency of the USA; Obama since illegally in this office has acted in every major decision against the interests of the USA; every sitting congressman, senator, court justice, CIA, FBI are fully aware that Obama is an ineligible, unqualified, even traitorous impostor.

Why is Obama not only still in office but will win certain re-election in November 2012?

That puzzling question can be answered by another puzzling question.

Why has there been no further terrorist attacks on the US mainland since September 11, 2001?

One very plausible explanation is that the United States government has been coerced into a undisclosed treaty with the militant Muslims to allow a Muslim to be elected the President of the USA in exchange for a full moratorium on any further terrorist attacks on America. Attacks upon the major cities, airports, national monuments, the Golden State Bridge, the Statue of Liberty and the White House itself which would cause untold civilian deaths and complete breakdown of American society.

This would explain the apparent cowardice of responsible members of government, of the press and of the media to almost frantically deny or ridicule any surfacing of the true facts about Obama and his parentage and education. They were not silent to protect their careers, they were terrified into silence to protect their lives.

This siege now being waged against America and American interests abroad has succeeded beyond any other take over of one nation by its sworn enemies. This enemy is Islamic. Its current leader is Iran. Its financial backer is Saudi Arabia. It now has its own trained and sponsored Muslim leader in Barack Hussein Obama II, the President of the USA ....... for life. Obama is a devious plant to slowly but surely prepare the American mind and will to Islamic laws and barbaric customs. Obama cannot be impeached, accused or removed from office without the risks of America being destroyed by Iranian sleeper terrorists already within its borders.

And this Islamic threat is far removed from, perhaps totally unaware of, the existing movement to obliterate not only Western values and religions but all religions on earth.
 

The 1917 Houston Rioting

In Spring 1917, the US War Department ordered two US Army military installations to be built in Harris County, Texas. These were Camp Logan and Ellington Field. The bases were initially to house and train soldiers from the Illinois National Guard and were very close to Houston.

On July 27, 1917 the all-Negro 3rd Battalion, 24th Infantry Regiment traveled by train to Houston from Camp Columbus, New Mexico accompanied by 7 White officers. The 24th had previously been stationed in the Philippines. There was extreme racial segregation in Texas and the wearing of an US Army uniform meant absolutely nothing different in being treated as a Negro. One Negro soldier was shot and killed for just wearing that army uniform. Both military and civilian coloureds were referred to as "niggers".

About noontime on August 23, 1917, in Houston's Fourth Ward, the Houston Police while searching for someone else were required to further take into custody an uncooperative Negress in the home. This woman was intoxicated and physically resisted the police until finally the arrest had to be made outside on the street.

A Negro soldier from the 24th interfered and was immediately beaten to the ground, arrested and jailed.

That afternoon of August 23rd, a Negro military police corporal, Charles Baltimore, went to the Houston Police Station to investigate the incident of earlier that day but to also to try to release another soldier who was in jail for an entirely separate charge. Soon heated arguments turned to violence resulting in Corporal Baltimore being beaten and arrested himself. However, Baltimore was soon released.

In the dark, rainy evening of August 23rd, 156 Negro soldiers disobeyed officers' orders, stole weapons from the camp depot and marched on the city of Houston. It appears that the main instigator was a Negro sergeant, Vida Henry, of I Company. These rioters were met outside of Houston by the Houston Police and a large force of armed civilians. A virtual race riot ensued in which 4 Negro soldiers, 4 Houston Police and 12 citizens were killed.  Also killed was a Captain Joseph Mattes of the Illinois National Guard. The instigator, Sgt Henry, shot and killed himself.

On August 24, 1917 order was restored around Houston, all Negro soldiers disarmed and the 3rd Battalion sent by rail back to New Mexico

The deaths of so many civilians and the long held fear of arming Negro military resulted in not one but three court martials to finally satisfy the US military.

Present at the first court martial were 3 Brigadier Generals, 7 full Colonels, 3 Lt Colonels. Of the officers eight were graduates of West Point. On December 6, 1917,  13 Negro soldiers including Corporal Baltimore were sentenced to be hanged for murder, 41 Negros were given life sentences.

On December 11 1917, on over-night built gallows, the 13 accused murderers were hanged simultaneously at 07:17 AM. Only Army and county personnel were allowed to witness the executions.

The second court martial (known as the Washington case) took place 6 days later in which 15 Negroes of the lower A Division were tried. Five given the death sentence.

At the third court martial (known as the Tillman case) on March 26 1918, 40 more Negro soldiers were charged; 11 sentenced to death; the others to life imprisonment.

On May 2 1918, General John Ruckman formally approved and sanctioned all sentences.



              

Cut to the Core

To those who chide about my persistence in discussing the Negro race dilemma in America today in 2012, after a half century of so-called "settled" opinions contrary to my views, I stubbornly answer, "no sound and permanent solution to any problem was ever finally found without going to the original core of it.". False conclusions stacked upon years of other false conclusions prove nothing toward the validity or soundness of the original problem. A train mistakenly switched onto one track will remain on that course until it is somehow reversed or shunted to the correct track no matter how much time elapsed or how sure the engineer thought he was proceeding correctly.

The heart and core of the major problem with race in America lies in establishing the valid answer to one debated question of anthropology. Are the proven limitations of the Negro the sole result of his bad environment or is his proven bad environment the result of his innate limitations? Can any and every effort to change or improve the Negro's surroundings and education ever reach the root cause of his comparatively inferior performance OR is such inferior performance strictly a matter of innate racial differences?

From 1930 on, every public decision or policy concerning the Negro race should have been decided on the proper answer to the question above: innate racial differences. Consider and consider very objectively the  bottomless predicament this nation faced yesterday, faces today and will face tomorrow because we were duped on to the wrong track, we allowed every public program, related law and an obscene political correctness to be enacted under the erroneous hypothesis of "the environment". And to repeat, in spite of all the then existing evidence proving that hypothesis to be WRONG.

What is more important and vital is informing Americans that they are marching off a cliff because of an environmental hypothesis of pure ILLUSION and to STOP, REFLECT, then commence to form racial policies based upon REALITY. As controversial and counter the status-quo as it will be, there is no other way to a permanent solution to the racial divide. Otherwise, very bluntly the White American culture and way of life will be destroyed by hordes of violent, anti-white, savages identical in innate behavior as in South Africa, Rhodesia, Kenya, Uganda in fact in all of the imposition of "Africa for the Africans".

When I was an outside investigator and collector for credit companies and even if the city was unfamiliar to me, when given the general location I would find the Negro neighborhoods by merely approaching them. I would know that 99% of the day's calls were going to be on the streets right there. This was not the case with the rare calls I was assigned in other poor sections of the city because these were White neighborhoods with somewhat of a pride in their appearance. In a large city or small town, the Negro neighborhoods were the same -  trash-strewn, broken glass, empty buildings and guys hanging around. One city project built with much fanfare for poor Negroes was Elmhaven in New Haven CT. A year later it was an utterly vandalized and destroyed building complex. Even the heavy cement seats bolted down for outside sitting were gone.

The mail boxes in the entry were smashed, doors ripped off and spray-painted all over the names.

The elevator was designed to only stop at even numbered floors so if one wanted to go to floor 5, he would go to floor 6 and walk down the stairwell to floor 5. Whenever I was forced to enter the closed stairwell, I would brace myself, take a deep breath, then bolt down the stairs as fast as I could. The stench of orange peels mixed with garbage and who knows what in that stairwell could sicken a hog. At the bottom of the stairs  were piles of garbage, debris and anything that could be indifferently thrown down there. Remember people still lived there, this was their home. This was the way Negroes lived. And I suspect that those types of government provided and subsidized housing developments are the same today or worse.

My experiences were in 1953, the crucial debate over Negro rights was going on. Did any liberal, equalitarian, pompous proponent of forced mixing of White and Negroes ever dare to witness the thousand examples like Elmhaven in New Haven alone? Have any useful idiots of that insane era ever admitted their errors?

"Repetition does not transform a lie into a truth." - Franklin Delano Roosevelt      

                       

Incidents of Insurrection

During World War II, Townsville, Queensland, Australia was a crucial base for American and Australian campaigns in the Pacific, including the Battle of the Coral Sea. It remains an Australian military base today.

Though never reported to or by the American press, in May 1942 Townsville was also the site of one of the biggest troop uprising within the US military. The shootings and rioting were by American Negro soldiers.

And it was not the first or last such racial and armed conflict in Australia.

In April 1942 a large contingent of American Negro troops arrived in Townsville. These Negroes had been trained very minimally in military discipline or behavior. They were basically American laborers brought in to help build airfields around Townsville. As per strict US military order, all officers were White, although there were Negro non-commissioned officers. Negro troops were very rarely committed to actual combat. These soldiers were from the 96th Battalion, US Army Corps of Engineers and were stationed at a base on the western outskirts of Townsville. This base was known as "Kelso".

Shortly after arrival, 100 Negro troops created a racial conflict near their base and had to be rounded up by the US Marines using bayonets and loaded rifles.

In May 1942, racial tensions between the White officers and Negro troops escalated to the point where several Negro ringleaders decided to machine gun the tents of the White officers. Thousands of rounds were fired, the White officers returned fire and estimates up to 19 personnel were killed and dozens more seriously wounded. Negro soldiers rampaged from the camp, terrorizing surrounding Australian homes and at least one rape was reported. The overall siege lasted over 8 hours.

Fully armed Australian troops  along with the Queensland Police and the Townsville Police were called in to roadblock the rioters from entering the city. The official accounts of these incidents are still in police archives.

The violence was subdued and many of the Negro rioters packed off to New Guinea.

Though kept completely secret by the Roosevelt administration, the whole affair was severe enough that in 1942, US Congressman Lyndon B. Johnson went to Australia and spent 3 days in Townsville. Johnson was given and examined official US and Australian military accounts of the Negro rioting and also the eyewitness report of a US journalist who was stationed at Kelso. But despite this, the rebellion was never reported by the US press but instead filed away in the national archives. President Roosevelt did not want any details of this racial incident to ever come out and, in fact, in 1943 Eleanor Roosevelt herself was dispatched to visit a newly established "Negro Only" service club in Townsville.

There were about 10,000 American Negro servicemen sent to Australia during the war. Australia had a very strict racial segregation. In 1942 there were also other clashes involving Negro GIs at Torrens Creek, Ingham, and Mt Isa, in Australia.

Later in 1944 in another part of the Pacific there was one of the most serious racial incident between Negro navy personnel and US Marines.

In July 1944 the 3rd Marine Division retook Guam from the Japanese at the cost of 1,600 Marine lives. Guam was turned into a base for allied operations. Five large airfields were constructed by the SeaBeas. B-29 super bombers could fly as far a mainland Japan.

In late August 1944, just a few weeks after already battle worn Marines had been exposed to the most vicious fighting and hand-to-hand combat with Japanese defenders, the all Negro 25th Depot Company of the US Navy started landing operations at the Naval Supply Depot. There sparked immediate tensions and minor incidents between the White Marines and the Negro naval personnel.

On Christmas Eve 1944, nine Negro Marines from the 25th Depot Company were on pass and went into Agana. There was a confrontation  between the Negroes and White Marines, supposedly shots were fired at the Negroes who were forced to flee back to the base. Eight were OK, one Negro Marine was missing.

In re-action, 40 Negro enlisted men piled into two trucks and started off toward Agana to find the missing man. However the MPs in Agana were informed and the MPs proceeded to erect barricades across all roads leading into Agana. The two trucks were stopped, there was a brief standoff but when the Negroes were told that the missing man had been found and was OK, they returned to their base.

On Christmas Day 1944, a Negro enlisted man walking back to camp from Agana was shot dead by two White Marines. Shortly thereafter another Negro enlisted man was shot and killed in Agana.

On December 26 1944, a vehicle driven by White Marines opened gunfire on the Negro depot. Camp guards returned fire and a White officer was wounded. The vehicle fled toward Agana;  behind them a number of armed Negro personnel. All vehicles were stopped by White MPs at a roadblock outside of Agana. All participants White or Negro were arrested and charged with attempted murder, rioting, unlawful assembly, and theft of government property.

At the Court of Inquiry, 45 Negro military personnel were court martialed and sent to prison.


    


    

Remember Rhodesia

Is the past our future?  The lesson of Southern Rhodesia.


In 1980, a flourishing, stable, free, democratic republic was murdered and hung out to decay by Great Britain, the United States and the West in the equalitarian name of "anti-racism" and "African-democracy". This civilization was once the proud British colony of Rhodesia. 


On November 11, 1965 Southern Rhodesia, which had experienced the highest casualty count of any of the British colonies in World War II, faced with the terrifying prospect of Negro majority rule, unilaterally declared independence from the British Empire. The Rhodesians were determined to avoid the disaster of a "one man, one vote" Negro majority rule.


Rhodesia had been denied independence because of the politically correct "NIMBAR policy" of Great Britain. This unjust policy was enforced by Prime Minister, Harold Wilson, and utterly discounted the proven success or stability of a colony and instead evaluated its commitment to universal manhood sufferage. NIMBAR stood for "No Independence Before African Rule".


After self-declared independence, Rhodesia faced endless economic sanctions imposed by the United Nations in the utopian aim to topple the new government of Ian Smith. Ian Smith had been an ace pilot for the Royal Air Force in World War II and was the duly elected leader of the Rhodesians. No foreign government, including the United States, recognized the new Rhodesia or welcomed it into the family of free republics. 


But Rhodesia was not defeated. It carried on honorably and successfully until about 1975 when South Africa withdrew its support and Marxist (Negro) terrorists renewed guerrilla war against Rhodesia. When Angola and Mozambique fell to Marxist majority rule, the United States under Secretary of State Henry Kissinger increased its pressure on Rhodesia to accept majority Negro rule. 


In 1980, the freed, Marxist terrorist prisoner, Robert Mugabe, became the President of the Republic of Zimbabwe, once Rhodesia, through African-style "democratic" elections. Under Mugabe's tyrannical and erratic rule Zimbabwe became a culture being murdered one White farm family at a time. The murder weapon being the West's own suicidal, liberal ideology applied to a totally unsuitable Negro racial context.


The lesson from the world's treatment of Rhodesia is this:


Political inclusion of Negroes in a liberal democracy inevitably transforms a society from a promised multi-racial utopia into a barbaric democracy; rule by the long knife. This is now demonstrated in Zimbabwe, a nation in poverty, where Negroes are 98.5 percent of the population.
     

Leftists Shalt Not Covet

A serious flaw in even the most intelligent critics of equalitarianism/socialism/communism is accepting that the more hard-core a progressive is, the deeper is his comprehension and conviction as to the equalitarian agendas. And that this pureness of motivation differs the hard- core socialist from the brain-washed or opportunist fringe adherents, paternally referred to by N. Lenin as the "useful idiots". 


Simply, and less dramatically put, it is far more likely that the driving motivation behind the hard-core leftist is truly just envy. Envy hides in a multitude of forms and expressions. Envy is a basic human emotion, it is not a validity of pure intellectual motivation. 


There is the envy of our Anglo-American  civilization or Western Culture and especially of the innate qualities of mind and character which built it. This envy morphs into a strong drive to denigrate its sources and to believe that its wealth and benefits must be dispensed to those less fortunate. 


There is the envy among academicians and intellectuals who instinctively resent the rewards and recognition of successful industrial, private enterprise. They are well aware that the qualities of leadership, courage and the ability to face reality in dealing with things are quite rare among them. They envy, thus denigrate, the man who is responsible for getting things done in spite of ruthless economic and natural obstacles. And yet they must begrudgingly accept that his achievements are the only source from which the leftist can "share the wealth" with others.


There are very few men in the hard-core left who have built their own fortunes. However even these individuals can be blinded into becoming useful idiots and even more likely are those whose fortunes are inherited. And if the society is a rich one with large accumulations of wealth from past accomplishments, the leftist is unfettered. His dispensing of seemingly endless funds of wealth allows him unbridled popularity and following with the masses. More and more useful idiots join the leftist ranks as they intellectualize discarding of the previous morality and truths. 


Slowly, by degrees, the irreversible damage of the leftist trend becomes apparent to some. The national heritage, built upon ideals and principles and experience of many years of  building and controlling a free society, slowly erodes away. Only at the last gasp of freedom and stability is it discovered that a civilization has been destroyed.      

The Racial Gap

Material wealth is not the only thing that can be coveted or stolen. It also is possible to steal a nation's culture, or better stated, debase it. There exists no surer way of debasing or destroying a culture than integrating it with a race that is without the capacity to sustain it.

At first, in its widest sense, race can be separated into three broad subdivisions of the human species, the White, the Yellow and the Black. Anthropologists go deeper and to the point of five subdivisions being Caucasoid (White), Mongoloid (Yellow), Congoid (pure Black), Capoid (Yellow-Black) and Australoid (Yellow-Brown).

All of these racial divisions represent some degree of difference in innate characteristics, distinctive by observation of physical form. In very significant other words, the racial differences are genetic and indicate the presence of characteristic genes.

In a comparison of the American White man (Caucasoid) and the American Negro (West African Congoid) the results reflect the opposite poles of the human racial spectrum. These are not merely differences between  sub-stocks inside one of the broader divisions -- these are differences between two of the largest human racial categories. And just as significant they indicate differences of position on the evolutionary scale as well. This means that if the typical Congoid Negro is the genetic essence of the Black and the European Caucasian an example of the White then we are coming as close to comparing the greatest gap possible between human beings, between American Negroes and American Whites.

Know Your Enemy

The real enemy of the American people is not centralized government by either political party but rather captive government by minority groups leading a New Orleans style Negro parade. A ludicrous spectacle followed by a motley gang of equalitarian fanatics, self-serving politicians and reverse discrimination by White traitors.

The present American Negro has the confused White populace on the run. It is a disgusting state of affairs. Why?

The American White race possesses the greatest technology on earth and enjoys the rewards of an advanced evolutionary status not only in self-government, standards of living and heritage but also in the power to enforce its will. Yet the White race cowers before the threats of a race  far, far behind in evolutionary grade and with no weapons other than unproven equalitarian gibberish. It wrings its hands in frustration and is willing to be blackmailed for unlimited White-earned money and public degradation to placate and appease the violence prone Negro. There is no possible explanation for this boot licking other than it is a form of hypnosis, a trance brought on by an assumption of White guilt based on a totally erroneous conception of the facts.

All governments throughout history have been infected by varying degrees of financial dishonesty. But there is no known instance in which intellectual dishonesty has been so widespread and condoned and damaging as is today in the area of race in America. It is corrupting the integrity of otherwise decent  citizens to an extent never witnessed before. And it is allowing the already corrupted, anti-American traitors to rise as far as the Presidency itself.          

Cultural Revolution in America

In the equalitarian/socialist cultural revolution of the 1960s, a very prophetic threat was issued against White American culture. This threat and communist tactic was "we will take your children from you". And they did.

How did the activists of the cultural revolution succeed in doing this?

The first World War was an eye-opener for the communist followers of Marx and Engels. In every nation, on every side the common people rejected communist ploys to revolt against the respective national governments and cultures. The armies remained loyal to the existing leader of the nation.

This effectively ended the credibility of the old communist theories on "worker" rebellion. A new brand of communist theory and activism came into being: "cultural revolution". These communists realized that the only possible revolution of any nation had to start in the conversion of the individual citizen. This meant the long and subversive destroying of the beliefs and dependency of the individual upon the existing culture.

And what were the obstacles to be removed in a culture?

First, the family; second, the religion, third, the heritage of the nation,  fourth, the restrictive personal moral codes of the people, fifth, the respect for authority and laws and then as the designer of this new cultural revolution (Gramsci) boasted "the citizenry will fall into our hands like ripe fruit". He was right on the money.

The family is to be portrayed as paternal tyranny, maternal psychosis, boring, stifling, and prone to sexual abuse.

Religion is to be dismissed as myth, no better than any other faith, suppression of women's and sexual rights.

The history and heritage of the culture is to be diminished in education, deemed to have violated minority rights, presented as no better than any other's past and to be hopelessly out-dated (determined by long dead White men) or (a Constitution out of touch with the present).

The moral standards of the people that resulted from national and religious precedents must be corrupted into a "do your own thing" loss of any morality at all. One of the prime goals of the communists was the acceptance of divorce as a natural and justifiable act of personal liberation.

The breakdown of respect and understanding of law and order unleashed the most violent, beastly manifestations of communist strategy. Suddenly the respected police officer on the beat was "a pig" and the youth vilifying him was "a freak". The breakdown went both ways.

The center for the gathering of the early cultural revolutionists (all Jews) was in Frankfurt, Germany, later to be referred to as "the Frankfurt School". In 1940, the Nazi plan to restrict the activities of German Jews forced the institution to re-locate to space provided for it at Columbia University in New York city.

From that liberal and Jewish haven, the cultural communists spread like cancer into the anthropology and social science departments of the major American universities. Their goal of cultural revolution never wavered.

They infiltrated the movie industry, the main stream press, the book publishing industry and especially in the television broadcasting industry.

By the end of the 1960s "hippie" or "flower child" cultural upheaval, the communists did indeed take a generation of American youths away from their parents and their heritage. The result of which is the incompetent, narcissistic, affirmative-action mulatto, Barack Hussein Obama.
   
  

Liberal Response or Lack Thereof

It has been very noticeable over 50 years of attempting to discuss racial or socialist matters with so-called liberal  relatives or  co-workers that any breakthrough of new facts or opinions at all contrary to their conformity is blindly rejected out of hand. And the liberal assumes a self-righteousness that vents hatred and scorn toward his opponent personally rather than ever feeling the moral duty to present facts, if any, regarding the subject at hand. And more delusional, to do so with a clear conscience.

In careful listening to these liberal people expound on equality or fairness, I find their motivations to be more dedicated to liberal conformity than ever dedicated to the truth. The roll of their eyes or their exasperated sighs are their only responses or expressions to being compelled to even listen to any point of view other than the stock liberal line. This also explains the inevitable, personal attack on anyone even close to threatening the liberal dogma on anything. The intensity of these personal attacks reach attempts to have the individual fired from his job even if the job itself had nothing to do with the matter, to instigate consumers to boycott a product or sponsorship, and to tie up opponents with needless legal suits or accusations.

I possess no credibility to judge these people's intelligence but there is a clue in their unfathomable persistence in defending discredited liberal political figures. One would imagine that the lies and deceptions of a Bill Clinton, the moral behavior of a Barney Frank and the obvious incompetence and disloyalty of a Barack Obama would convince a cretin to disown them but not so with the average liberal.

The answer is somewhere else and it is in the vast, uncontrollable entitlement programs which consume over a third of annual federal government spending. These programs are liberal "babies" and the left will elect even the most corrupt or mediocre politicians to protect them. And the Democrat politicians never object or call for  any reductions in entitlements because those are guaranteed Democrat votes.

So when an Obama reveals that he has X million dollars for his 2012 re-election campaign, reality must add to that the X trillion dollars spent by his administration on entitlement programs and their guaranteed votes for the man. Very few recipients of entitlements are going to vote against the hand that feeds them.
  

               

... AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH

Where had the courage gone over the last sixty years that was needed to tell the truth about racial limitations and differences? Because politically correct or not, the truth is that there is no equality in nature and doubly not so among the races of mankind.

What a pitiful, cowardly plight has befallen America with a misled, unnecessarily guilt-ridden majority of citizens entranced by false equalitarian dogma on race. A submissive mass media propagandizing the public with a scientific fraud. An America governed by a life-time hierarchy of political and judicial leaders with mediocre minds, little moral stamina and prostituting the truth to pander for minority votes. Tragedies compounded by the elections of these fools who came from a citizenry emasculated by several generations of compromise and sickening appeasement. That cringing appeasement being to the Negro race which like any parasite only demanded more and more.

The only answer is that the equalitarian dogma, like a diseased growth, contains within itself not only the seeds of proliferation, but the curse of inevitable societal collapse as well.

As to courage, let a man be told and taught incessantly that everything his forefathers had achieved was largely a matter of chance, the so-called lottery of life; that the perpetual poverty and ignorance of the Negro was not only a question of bad luck but more than likely the fault of himself and his White forefathers; that America's once standards of morals, fiscal responsibility and personal integrity were no better than those of any other culture; that the success of America was mostly by good fortune and nothing to be proud about as it was built upon the backs of Negro slaves; all humanity were innately equal and any distinctions were due to environmental causes - no, let any man have these lies drummed into him over and over and eventually his values and his courage to uphold them will change and deteriorate.

This change, this deterioration must soon spread its venom through the family, the community and the nation. This breakdown of morality is quickly sensed by the criminal, the disgruntled employee, the impressionable teenager and the indifferent teacher. No longer are fashionable the words, "distinguished" or "discriminating". In foolishly defending the present denial of any racial inferiority, the equalitarians necessarily had to destroy any concepts of racial superiority, because one concept could not exist along with the other.

With the neutralizing of racial superiority came the end of respect for authority, the end in the pride in the achievements of the past, the end in honoring the heritage of one's family, in honoring one's race, even in honoring one's country. Dragged down were those men of superior quality who had confidence in their own personal excellence and in their peers and in their race. This was the most serious loss as with it passed the genius of true leadership and the power and will to "raise up" rather than "level down".

Indeed what was lost were those qualities which had given Americans the courage to tell the truth.      

Define Your Terms

The bulk of my recent posts have come from personal notes and writings from over the past years.

This way I am re-writing about events and opinions that I actually have experienced.

I refer constantly to the words "equalitarian" and "equalitarianism". These are not legitimate words. I came across them many years ago in a book by a very prophetic writer, Carleton Putnam, who passed away in 1998.

This Mr. Putnam's definition of "equalitarian".

" One who subscribes to the dogma that for all practical purposes all races are innately (genetically) equal in intelligence and character, and that the differences between them are due chiefly to environment rather than heredity".

Note that this definition could be easily applied to the word, "communist".

Face Racial Facts

The colossal distortions of two facts constituted the main impetus of the equalitarian, left-wing agenda that had been allowed to infect then dominate racial opinions in the United States.

That first fact, long held for years, was that there is no such thing as equality in nature, surely not among men.

The equalitarian scheme to conceal this obvious fact and to purposefully contradict it has resulted in sixty years of corruption of American humanity. But all these sixty disruptive years, all of the resulting insane political correctness, all of the cowardly silence and appeasement, all of the losses of American standing in the world have not yet convinced the indoctrinated American people that they have been deceived and betrayed.

Intended or not, what destructive manifestations have appeared in America since 1950?

They are the decline of moral standards, the disrespect for distinction and authority, the appalling lowering of educational standards, the loss of juvenile control, the sordid descent of literature and entertainment, and in the inevitable corrupting of politicians to seek votes instead of principles. Also manifested are the rising violent crime rate by Negroes, punitive taxes and restrictions, government partiality to labor unions, the lack of discipline and workmanship in the labor force, the purposeful elimination of a servant class and the disgraceful appeasement of evil, mediocrity and outright lawlessness in many other aspects of American life.      

The second proven fact was that the Negro, wherever on earth, did not have the inborn capacity for Western Civilization and that social integration with him invariably produced deterioration in any White civilization that was foolish enough to try it. For proof of that, consider:

In all of history there had never been one single case of a stable, free civilization that was predominantly, or even substantially, Negro.
   
In all of history there had never been one single case in which a White civilization did not fail to deteriorate after integrating with Negroes.

In all history there had never been a case in which Whites and Negroes lived together unsegregated and failed to intermarry.

In all of history there is not a better example and proof of a Negro society left to its own resources after previous contact with White civilization than the Republic of Haiti. There is nothing in the Voodoo religion, the government of Haiti, its laws, its public education, its finances, or its culture that even suggests equality with any White culture or society.

Most important, in all of history what opportunities has the White man had that he did not make for himself and what opportunities or chances did the Negro lack that he could not have made for himself, had the Negro the innate capacity? The full-blooded Negro of Africa in all his years of existence and on his own, never developed the concepts of the wheel or the sail.

In essence, in the early 1950s the American people were not given the long-standing evidence on the innate racial capacities and variability of the American Negro. The people were knowingly allowed to judge for themselves the validity and soundness of proposed public policies on race based upon only undocumented assertions which all the available, existing evidence contradicted.

Black Blackmail

For the first half of the 20th century the specter of massive Negro rioting was countered by an unwritten truce between Negro leaders and the federal government. Starting in 1950 this undeclared truce began to break down. This culminated in the decade of 1960 - 1969 with uncontrollable Negro violence in major cities. The New York subway system was virtually shut down do to roaming, young Negroes terrorizing the subways.
The bizarre, self-inflicting cry of "Burn baby, burn" was gleefully shouted as Negroes torched their own neighborhoods, very reminiscent of the senseless destruction that would occur in Africa itself.

The Negro mayhem was stopped on a dime for one reason - Negro blackmail of the United States government.

Using the civil rights movement as a convenient, face-saving cover, the United States guaranteed the Negro leaders preferential treatment in education, housing, employment and subsistence to the Negro race. Barriers to Negro restriction of association with whites such as schools, public transportation, public facilities and the military were to be rapidly and legally removed. Of course this eventually was not enough for certain so-called Negro leaders who threatened and blackmailed businesses and industries to create non-existing positions or to provide free products for Negroes.

By the mid 1960s, the official plan or rationale of the federal government was to secretly create an artificial Negro middle class in the hope that such Negroes would have enough invested in racial stability and their own self-interest to at least not be the instigators of future Negro rioting. But to just mandate Negro preferences in government hiring was not enough. The federal government had to force the private sector to hire, promote and even create make-work positions for Negroes.

Obviously this secret agenda of the government to pay blackmail to the Negro would have been very difficult to conceal without the charade of the civil rights movement. The federal government had a huge stake in the civil rights movement succeeding. Most of the so-called debates and legal stands against desegregation and preferential treatment of the Negro were doomed from the start. The die had been cast.

And yet the question still lingers that if right away in the early 1950s the opponents of desegregation had focused their arguments on true Negro anthropology instead of on Constitutional grounds of states' rights, would the courts have been intellectually compelled to decide in their favor despite being pressured otherwise.

Though constantly maligned in the press and in films, the White Southerner understood and cared about the Southern Negro. The South enforced segregation of the races but still considered the Negro as a member of the South, in part as "one of their own". This is in sharp contrast with the hypocritical North. You see, in the South the Southerner did not care for the Negro as a race but fully accepted them as individuals. They were welcomed in Southern homes as nannies for White children, even in segregated eating establishments most of the waiters were Negroes. The exact opposite occurred in the North. The Northerner professed to love the Negroes as a race but disliked and avoided them as individuals. While I lived in Virginia my mother visited me from Connecticut. She was appalled and very upset with Negroes waiting on her in most restaurants. Something, of course, that any Southerner would not give one second's thought to.

Consider that by 1950 the Southern universities seats in anthropology and social sciences had too been infected and swayed by northern equalitarian philosophy. The South instinctively realized the real issue was in the racial limitations of the Negro but it had by then been misled so often that such reason did not exist that the Southerner had almost come to believe it. The same trance that was fogging the North had descended on the South but the South was principled enough to not succumb and destroy its culture.

But unfortunately the South chose to resist the trance of equalitarianism with a counter-illusion based on  Constitutional states' rights. The best minds of the South clung to the belief that states' rights was their best defense. Even more damaging, there appeared  to be an agenda among Southern politicians and officials that race was to no longer be even mentioned or hinted at. Feverish argument over the validity of the 14th Amendment wasted precious time in both the South and the North, while no one addressed or challenged the root of the whole trouble - the assumption that the Negro was ready and able to be equal in White American society.
     
                

The Mirror of Free Societies

Because equlitarians survive only through misrepresentation there is no amazement that they propose that free societies, which they love to call "democracies", can be established and maintained by a snap of their devious finger. They conveniently overlook that it took centuries before any self-sustaining "democracies" worthy of such a name were established. What bizarre process of rationalization and misrepresentation can equalitarians assume and risk that the American Negro, the least intelligent of American races, could be granted equality with these other races by the bang of a gavel?

A stable, free civilization is first and foremost a matter and necessity of individual character in its population. Like  any construction of worth, basic procedures must occur. Individual frugality leads to balanced public budgets. Individual self-control leads to public law and order. Individual restraint leads to the rule of reason in governments and juries. Individual self-reliance minimizes the burden of taxation. Individual pride leaves no man with the obligation of sharing the fruits of his labor with the shiftlessness of others.

These are the qualities on which a free society rests. How many currently exist among the average American Negro population?

Even the most die hard equalitarian is forced to admit that it does the community no good to compel a citizen to sacrifice for his neighbor if then the citizen takes his place in destitution. It has been long proven that once you concede to the appetite of certain groups in spending the money of other groups, it becomes almost insatiable. In fact the group demands more and more and will rebel at reducing or stopping the transfer of funds.

Here are the words and opinions written by a writer on African affairs:

"I have yet to meet more than a handful of Africans who wanted to work. There are a few, but so few that they can be considered non-existent. ... There is no desire to succeed here - only an unearned claim for equality with nations that have spent millennia climbing out of barbarism. The African is still in an infantile stage of violence. His answer to any problem is the spear, the club or the witch doctor ... Without white direction and control the African Negro can do nothing. There are no African achievements."

When my son, now 56, was very young he and I joined a father-son group, Indian Guides.
Among the other young boys was a lad who was completely blind. In the often sincere, well-meaning ploys to include the blind boy as much as possible, I was somehow compelled to be irked at these attempts.  Not irked in a uncaring way but irked that the other boys in the tribe were subjected and coerced into forfeiting the normal level of their abilities to the lower level of a blind boy. I saw nothing positive being gained by these ploys other than the "feel good" residue left in some fathers.

One meeting it was suggested by some father that the boys on hands and knees form two opposing lines and attempt to see how many could reach their opponents side. The two lines were facing head on to each other. Then the fog of equalitarianism settled in the room because the lights were to be turned off and the scramble performed in total darkness. No need, I hope, to explain why. At that point I pulled my son aside and much to his dismay told him that he would not participate. The lights went out, the scramble began  but very quickly the laughter turned into crying as heads met heads. When the lights were turned back on there was a cluster of several boys lying on the floor holding their heads and wailing.

My actions that evening may well seem heartless. The other fathers were only trying to include the blind boy as much as possible. But it proved, to me at least, that nothing is ever gained by leveling down. Frankly I have no answer as to how the level of ability of the blind lad could be raised up in those unique circumstances. But that is not the point. The raw truth was that sighted boys and blind boys were not equal in most situations and never would be. All the well-meaning, "feel good", equalitarian actions denying that were futile, disruptive and doomed to fail.

At present in 2012, political correctness has "encouraged" the group to abandon the word, "Indian", from their name. They are now named some meaningless "Something Guides". At least some progress has been made. And important progress too.
                 

Equalitarian Indoctrination

I have tried to be extremely cognizant and respectful of the sincere mindset of readers now two generations younger than I am because they are the educational product of equalitarian dominance. But I am also concerned about their rigid intolerance toward and censoring of any other point of view (or fact) other than the equalitarian. I have concluded that such closed mindedness as to racial equality borders on mind control. These two generations received their education during the deepest point of equalitarian hypnosis. A trance-like hypnosis that  purposely generated closed mindness be it as to race or in other fields. Their constant accusation of intolerance in any one challenging their unyielding point of view rang pitifully hollow when the intolerance was so obviously emanating from their equalitarian side. They were not really concerned about intolerance, they were frightened by the weakness and absurdity of their racial point of view. The equalitarian indoctrination was not powerful enough to eradicate all common sense but it successfully dinned into them fraudulent theories that their adult minds protected at any cost. This is far different from normal contention between generations. This close mindedness is one of the most serious problems facing this country. It took over a decade to eradicate the belief in Nazism in post-war Germany. Such mind control is called indoctrination for a very good reason.

Liberalism once meant the desire to improve the condition of mankind by creating an inspirational setting. The true liberal knew that the challenges of life creates inequalities. He conceded that one cannot have excellence unless someone or something excels. The true liberal was cognizant that humans only grow through effort, indeed spiritual, moral and intellectual effort.

The equalitarian is well aware of these things also but he shuns challenge and envies excellence. He envies the excellence he either cannot achieve or will not exert the effort of achieving. His mindset forces him to destroy avenues to excellence. The equalitarian ignites such envy in others as such contrived envy is his life's blood. He strives to convince others that success and excellence are expressions of injustice to themselves. But most of all, he worships mediocrity. Every motive revolves around leveling down, never raising up. He knows that he must first destroy then rebuild the spiritual, the moral and the intellectual. Rebuild in a setting favorable to mediocrity.

But in the attempt to indoctrinate racial attitudes, the equalitarian flounders. Despite the intensity of indoctrination, despite the depth of the trance the American people are still vaguely aware of how untenable are their positions on race and the obvious contradictions to such positions. But, and a big "but", the total indoctrination is so powerful that the people can only muddle on, forced to rationalize and defend the incredulous. Snared in endless obvious contradictions, present day equalitarian stooges can only lash out at detractors or escape from them with ridicule or personal attacks. One moment of unbiased reflection should convince them that their precious cause is not granting human rights to the Negro but stealing them from the white citizens, from themselves. They  have become useful idiots in the destruction of their own civilization.
                          

The Battleground of Thought

The true conflict in America is the same in 2012 as in 1960. It is a struggle between socialist equalitarianism on one side and individual freedom and responsibility on the other. In the first system is the belief that benefits should come from the State. In the second system that benefits should be obtained from individual effort.

I assume the reader knows what individual effort means but what really is "the State"? To begin, "the State" is a purely theoretical concept which exists only in the mind. It is no more than a name which individuals give to a method they use for working together to achieve certain objectives. The only material reality is the individual. Thus whenever one hears talk of dependence on "the State", it actually means some individuals depending on other individuals. The prevalent idea that "the State" is an entity that can be leaned on is just one of the stupidities one must expect from equalitarianism. The only entity of consciousness is the individual, "the State" can never qualify in that respect. Communism seeks to warp the reality of the individual into its exact opposite by confusing the minds of the exploited. The granting of unearned rights to some individuals is in reality stealing them from others. All rights must be limited by the rights of others. The greatest of all human rights is the right of a race to protect its culture from deterioration.  

Long Delayed Time For The Truth

This re-examining of the American civil rights movement with its dominant fallacy of the non-existent equality of men will be repulsive to most readers in 2012. Because along with the success of the imposition of this blatantly erroneous equalitarian ideology was the equal success of suppression of the truth concerning the genetic foundation of life. This fallacy would be serious in academic circles, even in the fog of liberal individuals but far more serious in the nation's perception of race. This blindness to genetic racial limitations permitted America to embrace a fallacy and to corrupt its own citizens in its name. An initial falsehood remains false despite massive public support, legislation, judicial decisions or the passage of time. The equalitarian concept of equality of men is just as untrue in 2012 as in 1960. The people espousing it today are just as wrong as others were sixty years ago. The entire foundation of the civil rights movement was based upon a calculated lie.

Compounding this national tragedy was a concurrent tragedy. This was and is the erosion of the minds of seemingly sensible people until while in conceding that this fallacy was indeed fallacy, they soothed their consciences in compromise, appeasement and defeatism. They prostituted their ethics and their children's  education to retain careers and social standing. They may have been sound at heart but despicable in their silence. These were not the Americans of a once native spirit that had built this nation.

Writing this in 2012 there is the need to clarify such accusations as to readers under 50 years of age. What such readers believe about racial equality is not false in their minds. Odds are the teachers who taught them this fallacy were not consciously deceiving as it is what they were taught. But for once discard your equalitarian blinders because the original premise of the civil rights movement was a deliberate, calculated falsehood. Its utterly implausible premise of racial equality was not believed or accepted by any other authorities of the time. Genetic racial limitations should have been undisputed. History taught it. Other free sciences confirmed it. It was not contested by anyone except the outright self-serving minority activists of the so-called civil rights movement whose skillful manipulation of social science and American innate desire for fairness fostered the direct opposite premise upon an unguarded nation.

For 50 years the defeatist rationale of appeasement has echoed and re-echoed. Its words varied from "it's too late", "what can we do about it now?", "it's settled law" to "we do not want to hear about it" to finally "stop bringing it up in mixed company". It is time long overdue to remind such hand-wringers that the answer to those and other cries of appeasement is to face up to the truth, express the truth, demand the truth in spite of any or all consequences. Never forget that equality of opportunity, the most important characteristic of America, was distorted to favor social, cultural and genetic equality. Equalitarian propaganda grasped the door of pity to deceive our hearts and minds. Environment became the basis of equalitarian judgements and yet somehow the environment declined as to inspirational  values. Conformity dwarfed initiative. Security overshadowed enterprise. Distinction was disparaged to the point that excellence was destroyed. Social peace trumped true social justice. America lapsed into a trance-like hypnosis in order to believe and enforce the unbelievable. It is time for the sleeping beauty to awaken.          

A Culture Upside Down

What truly happened during the civil rights movement of the 1960s?

A stable but gullible, trusting nation, the United States of America, was purposefully deceived and misled by  certain activist groups, mostly of Jewish design, into not only believing but perpetrating that Negroes have an inborn capacity for western civilization equal to the white race. This subterfuge had nothing to do with Negro rights but for the own self-interest of these groups. This erroneous concept has for the next sixty years caused the government and the courts and the education system to feel morally justified, indeed obligated, in enforcing social integration and preferable treatment for the Negro. And, may I remind you, that the Negro of 1960 was not the propped up, affirmative action, hybrid of 2012. Even years after the start of the civil rights movement the Travelers Insurance Company would not underwrite life insurance for any Negro because of his lifestyle, health habits and short life span.

The average Negro of 1960 did not have the inborn capacity for western civilization and social integration with him invariably led in great part to the present deterioration of American society. An honest appraisal of present day Detroit, about to be taken over by the state of Michigan, should convince the most brain-washed liberal that Negroes cannot maintain stable governments when left to their own management. That despite all mandated, government attempts to bring the Negro to the level of the white race, when left on their own the Negroes self-destruct. The revealing images of the third world sub-culture of Negro America during the hurricane Katrina in New Orleans shocked America and the world.

But the equalitarian agenda of the civil rights minority groups also manifested itself in the socialist drifting to the left of the American culture and could never have been accepted or tolerated by the general public without the seeds of distortion and revisionism planted by earlier equalitarian activists. One must have lived through or have thoroughly studied the America of 1960 to fully grasp the decline in moral standards. When part of the mighty British army capitulated to Colonial forces in the Revolution, the British troops were forced
to lay down their arms and march away. As the British marched their bands played the song, "The World Turned Upside Down" to describe their disbelief and bafflement that a rag-tailed, civilian army had defeated part of the greatest army in the world. I feel the exact same disbelief and bafflement in comparing the moral standards of pre-1960 America to the decadent cesspool of today's America.

The present day discarding of the once moral standards of the nation is not a fruitful shedding of obsolete and racist vestiges of the past. It is the loss of direction of a once great and god-fearing nation. It is a loss based substantially upon one colossal error of fact, human equality. There is no such thing as equality in nature and surely no such thing as equality among men. The refusal to accept this obvious fact allowed into motion six decades of outright unjust mandates and the corrupting of American culture as a whole. Most readers under 60 years of age will be offended by those statements. They have been brain-washed and their focus of morality corrupted. To borrow from Jesus, "forgive them for they know not what they do."            

Follow the Integration Star (of David)

Reader's caution. This blog contains personal opinion which is accusative of the Jewish influence, motivation and activism in the progressive movements to replace the scientific doctrines of racial equality with the present equalitarian theories of racial equality. This involvement of this particular Jewish group was major, self-serving and deliberate.

Until 1880 the American racial stocks were loosely defined by Theodore Roosevelt in 1881 as "English-Speaking". The Americans and the British were two basically similar  branches of the English race which before and after American independence assimilated and made "Englishmen" of many other peoples. In America the pure English blood of New England infused with the blood of the Dutch, of the German, of the Scandinavian and of the Irish and produced composite racial stock of descendants as "Anglo-American" as ever.

In the 1880's conditions changed dramatically. Immigration to the US shifted from northern Europe to eastern and southern Europe thus newer branches of the white race with vast different temperaments and traditions arrived in greater and greater numbers. Some of these stocks came from backgrounds of the highest culture but most of the new arrivals were from stocks that had not been able to maintain stable, free societies. Many were state-less European Jews.

These new arrivals were not readily or willingly assimilated into the prevailing American stock or culture. And some Jews smarting under truly unjust discrimination became obsessed with proving that they not only were just as good as the native Americans but religiously and culturally superior. The Jews were ever mindful in keeping their own stock pure but had no hesitation in meddling in the affairs of others. With clear and ulterior purpose certain groups of Jews embarked on the apparently spontaneous movement to establish that all races were equal in their adaptability to the white, American civilization.

This entailed Jews being well educated, staunch in career purpose, given full Jewish community support and financing; all with the goal of reaching positions of influence in education and the social sciences. One result was that important chairs of anthropology and sociology in many leading universities were eventually taken over by men from such Jewish groups. So by the 1930's several generations of American youth had come under such influence. The outcome was the exploitation of equalitarian theories in anthropology and related theories in the field of sociology.

To clarify my belief as to Jewish involvement in the equalitarian movement, I must add here that membership in the Jewish, or other, race by no means determines membership in a specific group. Indeed the main impetus of the actual civil rights movement stemmed from non-Jewish useful idiots who let their hearts fog their heads. Some carved out lifetime careers as entertainers or writers by openly milking the fervor and emotion of the turmoil of the time.

It was only a slight progression to adopting these new equalitarian theories and applying them to the new battle cry, integration. It now appears that this application of theories was far more to entrench or solidify them in the sciences and to propel the goals of the Jewish groups. Freedom and advancement of the negro were not the true goal but rather a useful, distracting cover.

What is mystifying to me is that these white activists be they Jewish or whatever should propagate false theories and doctrines which were bound to weaken the white race as a whole. In  present day Israel is it called the "Samson option" in reference to mutual nuclear obliteration. Why would any rational persons risk pulling down the pillars of the temple upon their very heads? Especially if they were not even sincere about their actions. This self-serving treason was repugnant to me then and now.        

But, to repeat, there would be no greater injustice or historical error than to accuse all of the Jewish immigrants of the time of participating in or even sharing in the above conspiracy or promoting its policies.

One last point. As to the inevitable liberal rebuttals, then and now, which would parrot transparent attempts to deflect annoying truths by ridicule including ,with a patronizing sneer, quoting older "authorities", consider the following as perhaps appearing in a math textbook in 2012.

"Prior to 2000 it was the fashion to suppose 2 + 2 = 4. Now every one knows that in light of advanced research that it is utterly mind boggling that this belief could be universally accepted. Dr Ohne Tattergreis actually writes that 2 + 2 = 4  in several of her textbooks but the dates of these books now suffice to discredit her. As any well informed person knows, about 1999, and with increasing validity ever since, science began to discover that 2 + 2 = 6.  Today, in 2012, despite persistent lingering of some to the past, no reputable scientist would suggest anything else. For further discussion, see Chapters 14 & 22."
    

The Equality Bell

It is difficult to explain to and perhaps unfair to expect from any one born after 1950 to fully grasp the impact that the two decades from 1930 to 1950 of equalitarian ideological pressure forced upon the sciences in America. The entire concept of the nature of man was turned on its head. What had been considered solid, researched theories on race, gender, community, religion and equality for 100 years were flipped over like a pancake. But no other of these were as pressured and distorted to the degree as equality. Because ideological equality was the bed rock of socialism, communism and of the American progressive movement.

The collectivists which included socialists and communists had learned a hard lesson in the first quarter of the 20th century. Against basic Marxist theory, the US labor force strongly resisted communist attempts to agitate the average worker into rebellion let alone revolution. Most of the large manufacturing jobs were unionized or fairly paid with benefits. And communist influences in the large unions were exposed and driven out in time.

The collectivists turned the focus and hopes for civil unrest and revolution upon the American Negro. The Southern segregation of the negro and the more subtle but just as vehement racial attitudes of the rest of the country toward him were exactly the type of gunpowder to explode into racial turmoil and national disruption. The foreign communists of the time aided, abetted and subsidized the so-called "civil rights" movement. It melded nicely with their equalitarian ideas and practices. The emotional propaganda that was spewed out  converted thousands of useful idiots to organize "sit-ins", boycotts, marches and finally legislation.                

What could be more natural and believable than that a movement calling itself Civil Rights here, Communism in the USSR, Marxism somewhere and Socialism somewhere else would in its strategy focus on the subversion of the social sciences as well as governments? And these "isms" all having the common base of equalitarianism.  Quickly the subversion wormed its way into the Protestant churches using a hollow appeal for pity, Christian love and concern for the underdog in order to make the equalitarian fallacy more acceptable. The underdog always portrayed as a victim of some nebulous oppression but never of his own conduct. The negro underdog now to made to appear as the equal in all innate capacity.

The long held and valid American doctrine of equality of opportunity had been subverted into a manifesto of social, cultural, economic and genetic equality. By 1954 this subversion was reflected in the thinking of the Supreme Court and in its judgement by issuing its desegregation order.

None of this was done in accordance with long held, true American values. None of this was even American. A moderate amount of subterfuge may be tolerated for strictly charity's sake. But no American of 1954 or of 2012, now cognizant of the truth, should tolerate any further continuance of this equalitarian treason and should demand its obliteration from our shores. Just what is the original definition of the word, equality?  

The true intent and foundation of the American ideal concept of equality is to be found in Jefferson's original copy of the Declaration of Independence. The original words  were "All men are born equally free". In addition, Jefferson followed the phrase "All men are created equal" with "they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights .... among which are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness". Liberty was given the same importance as equality. The only sense in which equality can exist along with liberty is in the sense of equality of  opportunity and equality before the law. Because if men are free they will not be equal and where men are equal they are not free. Just compare the freedom of opportunity in America as derived from the varied abilities of its citizens to the cookie-cutter equality of the former USSR with its absence of freedom. To repeat: liberty and equality cannot exist together. The enforcement of racial equality in the US is in proportion to its loss of liberty. For every set-aside or affirmative action job filled to attempt equality there is the loss of liberty for the applicant not favored.

Also always keep in mind that the Declaration of Independence is not the basis of our government. The Constitution is the basis and in its stated purpose no mention is made of equality.  

Prophetic Hindsight

By 1960 no American anthropologist or sociologist would find employment if he openly endorsed the provable racial inequality of man.

Starting with a strong northeastern nucleus, equalitarian social anthropologists captured important positions in most northern and west coast universities.

This was aided and abetted by equalitarians in government, the entertainment field and, most effective, in the main stream press. This has created and dominated public opinion in these areas and has for 50 years rendered it virtually impossible for anyone disagreeing to retain his position or even his social standing. This being just another example of the equalitarian brandishing the economic club over any serious opponent.

Never in US history have the main stream press and the other media of public communication so strangled and suppressed the beliefs of such a vast majority of citizens.

The once impartial newspapers, magazines, broadcast networks sunk to sheer equalitarian propaganda. This completed a troika of conspiracy, fraud and intimidation. Conspiracy to gain control of the centers of education and news dissemination; fraud in teaching provably false racial doctrines; and intimidation by savagely attacking and suppressing any one who dared to speak the truth. For over 50 years it has been sheer hypocrisy to speak of freedom of the main stream press or of any other kind when such deliberate suppression of open and honest viewpoints is allowed to exist.

To look to history for explanation  be aware that the so called civil rights movement first appeared in 1866 along with other radical, utopian, social reforms coming from the peculiar reform culture of the equalitarian North. Not all of these reforms were related to slavery.

In hindsight, the fears and perceptions of the South were right on target. Everything that the secessionists warned about has since come true, true beyond their worst nightmares. The "Negro" has been hoaxed into the "African-American" and has been elevated  above Whites by liberal, equalitarian fanatics. This modern liberal has even come so far as to deny the very existence of racial differences and instead has tarred White racial identity as somehow evil and provocative. Grey walls of political correctness and racial conformity now imprison the entire nation.

Now in the 21st century the same fanatical equalitarian specter that destroyed the Confederacy and 20th century anthropology has turned against the White citizens of the North and West, whose very ancestors fought for the Union. It has turned against Western Civilization itself.      

My Frame of Reasoning

My blogs as of now are designed to be of a very broad analysis of HOW certain American values were first deviously undermined, next propagandized to be obsolete and finally discarded. I have lived through and was politically active in the period of time I hope to expose. My personal opinions as to the American Negro were formulated by working as an investigator and outside bill collector in New Haven CT, my experiences enlisting in the regular army (RA) during the Korean conflict and serving with only the second tier of draftees in the US army following President Truman's order that the army be desegregated, as a police officer in North Haven Ct,  and by over 50 years of deep interest and study of the race.

I lived in the Newport News area of Virginia during southern segregation of negroes and was thoroughly convinced of the validity of segregation. Only then did I realize what misconceptions the North held as to the average negro man or woman and how morally unjust it would be to force desegregation upon that section of the nation. I worked with and associated with southern whites and came face to face with the disgraceful treatment by the North to its fellow southern citizens both before and during Reconstruction of the 1861 war between the states. That bloody, unnecessary conflict was not a "civil war". A civil war exists when there is contention for the government of the nation. The South never intended to occupy Washington DC. The South was seceding FROM the Union not attempting to take control of it. The South just desired to be free of the meddlesome, equalitarian, uncouth mishmash of socialist rabble that dominated the North then and dominates America now. Few other words can capture the tragic loss of Southern values and culture than the title of Margaret Mitchell's novel .... "Gone with the Wind". Years of Southern nobility scattered to the wind like dry dandelion seed.

This is all may be dusty history to some but its truths and principles are even more pertinent today  What the civil rights equalitarians have never understood or accepted is that social status, as anything of worth, must be earned. True, lasting equality of association has to be mutually agreed to. It cannot and never will be gained by arbitrary force or edict of law.

I hold no personal animosity toward the negro. No negro has ever harmed me in any way. One of kindest non-com I knew was a negro master sergeant. But just like with a child or loved one there are facts that any human with two eyes must see despite the relationship. Facts as to pure-blooded negroes like:

The honest (not contrived) number of  blacks who have contributed to great literature, engineering, medicine, philosophy, or abstract science. Athletic prowess or musical talent are not matters of  character or intelligence. To be frank, other than NBA basketball and hip-hop culture, in what areas do negroes on their own merit stand out?  I agree that equality of opportunity and equality before the law, if with honest intent, are necessary and should be enforced by the law as far as reasonably possible. But, to repeat, to desegregate presupposed an achieved status which the the average negro had not yet earned. The compelling of  desegregation has unleashed over 50 years of  smoldering opposition and outright negro cultural mayhem.

The equality concept or doctrine in general without a facade of propaganda is so pitifully untenable that it falls to pieces at the slightest serious, thoughtful examination.          

          
  

The Mixed-Blood Deception

From 1900 the aim of the progressives was to methodically install equalitarianism in every college faculty, every social scientist and every facet of American influence, entertainment and literature.

This was not accomplished by chance or through the will or vote of the people. It was imposed by causing the fracture and discarding of American culture and values. They relentlessly used the law, the courts and even the Constitution to further their ends. The progressives have long reached the power to effect their own legislation.
This equalitarian victory was most prevalent in the decisions and enforcement of so-called civil rights.

It was vital to silence reputable challenges to their untenable theories and findings on race. This solidified a base of useful idiots in condemning any discussion of the innate limitations of the negro. To even question this would bring down possible loss of career, social disdain, and even legal actions.

And there was a very little discussed weapon in this equalitarian deception. A race card to be dealt whenever needed to defend appearances or distort scientific tests. This was the mixed-blood individual.

The truly fair way to compare races is by comparing average vs average. Not as the progressives tried to hoodwink by comparing the best of negroes against the worst of whites. There was the mixture of white and negro blood everywhere in the country but it was far more common in the North. Thus the judgments and decisions of Northerners were subject to deception and often based only on half of the evidence that could be contrary to equalitarian theory. The Northern voter had almost no opportunity to evaluate or decide upon the pure blooded negroes of the South. They had never seen or spoken to a southern negro field hand.

Today in 2012 a mixed-blood is President. Meaningful or not, it is very unlikely for a pure blooded negro (if there is any then) to be nominated for or elected President for a long time.