Because equlitarians survive only through misrepresentation there is no amazement that they propose that free societies, which they love to call "democracies", can be established and maintained by a snap of their devious finger. They conveniently overlook that it took centuries before any self-sustaining "democracies" worthy of such a name were established. What bizarre process of rationalization and misrepresentation can equalitarians assume and risk that the American Negro, the least intelligent of American races, could be granted equality with these other races by the bang of a gavel?
A stable, free civilization is first and foremost a matter and necessity of individual character in its population. Like any construction of worth, basic procedures must occur. Individual frugality leads to balanced public budgets. Individual self-control leads to public law and order. Individual restraint leads to the rule of reason in governments and juries. Individual self-reliance minimizes the burden of taxation. Individual pride leaves no man with the obligation of sharing the fruits of his labor with the shiftlessness of others.
These are the qualities on which a free society rests. How many currently exist among the average American Negro population?
Even the most die hard equalitarian is forced to admit that it does the community no good to compel a citizen to sacrifice for his neighbor if then the citizen takes his place in destitution. It has been long proven that once you concede to the appetite of certain groups in spending the money of other groups, it becomes almost insatiable. In fact the group demands more and more and will rebel at reducing or stopping the transfer of funds.
Here are the words and opinions written by a writer on African affairs:
"I have yet to meet more than a handful of Africans who wanted to work. There are a few, but so few that they can be considered non-existent. ... There is no desire to succeed here - only an unearned claim for equality with nations that have spent millennia climbing out of barbarism. The African is still in an infantile stage of violence. His answer to any problem is the spear, the club or the witch doctor ... Without white direction and control the African Negro can do nothing. There are no African achievements."
When my son, now 56, was very young he and I joined a father-son group, Indian Guides.
Among the other young boys was a lad who was completely blind. In the often sincere, well-meaning ploys to include the blind boy as much as possible, I was somehow compelled to be irked at these attempts. Not irked in a uncaring way but irked that the other boys in the tribe were subjected and coerced into forfeiting the normal level of their abilities to the lower level of a blind boy. I saw nothing positive being gained by these ploys other than the "feel good" residue left in some fathers.
One meeting it was suggested by some father that the boys on hands and knees form two opposing lines and attempt to see how many could reach their opponents side. The two lines were facing head on to each other. Then the fog of equalitarianism settled in the room because the lights were to be turned off and the scramble performed in total darkness. No need, I hope, to explain why. At that point I pulled my son aside and much to his dismay told him that he would not participate. The lights went out, the scramble began but very quickly the laughter turned into crying as heads met heads. When the lights were turned back on there was a cluster of several boys lying on the floor holding their heads and wailing.
My actions that evening may well seem heartless. The other fathers were only trying to include the blind boy as much as possible. But it proved, to me at least, that nothing is ever gained by leveling down. Frankly I have no answer as to how the level of ability of the blind lad could be raised up in those unique circumstances. But that is not the point. The raw truth was that sighted boys and blind boys were not equal in most situations and never would be. All the well-meaning, "feel good", equalitarian actions denying that were futile, disruptive and doomed to fail.
At present in 2012, political correctness has "encouraged" the group to abandon the word, "Indian", from their name. They are now named some meaningless "Something Guides". At least some progress has been made. And important progress too.
No comments:
Post a Comment