Reader's caution. This blog contains personal opinion which is accusative of the Jewish influence, motivation and activism in the progressive movements to replace the scientific doctrines of racial equality with the present equalitarian theories of racial equality. This involvement of this particular Jewish group was major, self-serving and deliberate.
Until 1880 the American racial stocks were loosely defined by Theodore Roosevelt in 1881 as "English-Speaking". The Americans and the British were two basically similar branches of the English race which before and after American independence assimilated and made "Englishmen" of many other peoples. In America the pure English blood of New England infused with the blood of the Dutch, of the German, of the Scandinavian and of the Irish and produced composite racial stock of descendants as "Anglo-American" as ever.
In the 1880's conditions changed dramatically. Immigration to the US shifted from northern Europe to eastern and southern Europe thus newer branches of the white race with vast different temperaments and traditions arrived in greater and greater numbers. Some of these stocks came from backgrounds of the highest culture but most of the new arrivals were from stocks that had not been able to maintain stable, free societies. Many were state-less European Jews.
These new arrivals were not readily or willingly assimilated into the prevailing American stock or culture. And some Jews smarting under truly unjust discrimination became obsessed with proving that they not only were just as good as the native Americans but religiously and culturally superior. The Jews were ever mindful in keeping their own stock pure but had no hesitation in meddling in the affairs of others. With clear and ulterior purpose certain groups of Jews embarked on the apparently spontaneous movement to establish that all races were equal in their adaptability to the white, American civilization.
This entailed Jews being well educated, staunch in career purpose, given full Jewish community support and financing; all with the goal of reaching positions of influence in education and the social sciences. One result was that important chairs of anthropology and sociology in many leading universities were eventually taken over by men from such Jewish groups. So by the 1930's several generations of American youth had come under such influence. The outcome was the exploitation of equalitarian theories in anthropology and related theories in the field of sociology.
To clarify my belief as to Jewish involvement in the equalitarian movement, I must add here that membership in the Jewish, or other, race by no means determines membership in a specific group. Indeed the main impetus of the actual civil rights movement stemmed from non-Jewish useful idiots who let their hearts fog their heads. Some carved out lifetime careers as entertainers or writers by openly milking the fervor and emotion of the turmoil of the time.
It was only a slight progression to adopting these new equalitarian theories and applying them to the new battle cry, integration. It now appears that this application of theories was far more to entrench or solidify them in the sciences and to propel the goals of the Jewish groups. Freedom and advancement of the negro were not the true goal but rather a useful, distracting cover.
What is mystifying to me is that these white activists be they Jewish or whatever should propagate false theories and doctrines which were bound to weaken the white race as a whole. In present day Israel is it called the "Samson option" in reference to mutual nuclear obliteration. Why would any rational persons risk pulling down the pillars of the temple upon their very heads? Especially if they were not even sincere about their actions. This self-serving treason was repugnant to me then and now.
But, to repeat, there would be no greater injustice or historical error than to accuse all of the Jewish immigrants of the time of participating in or even sharing in the above conspiracy or promoting its policies.
One last point. As to the inevitable liberal rebuttals, then and now, which would parrot transparent attempts to deflect annoying truths by ridicule including ,with a patronizing sneer, quoting older "authorities", consider the following as perhaps appearing in a math textbook in 2012.
"Prior to 2000 it was the fashion to suppose 2 + 2 = 4. Now every one knows that in light of advanced research that it is utterly mind boggling that this belief could be universally accepted. Dr Ohne Tattergreis actually writes that 2 + 2 = 4 in several of her textbooks but the dates of these books now suffice to discredit her. As any well informed person knows, about 1999, and with increasing validity ever since, science began to discover that 2 + 2 = 6. Today, in 2012, despite persistent lingering of some to the past, no reputable scientist would suggest anything else. For further discussion, see Chapters 14 & 22."
No comments:
Post a Comment